Skip to content

Merge upstream block/buzz main into fork main (2026-09-04b) - #139

Merged
yjc801 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
fork-sync/2026-09-04b
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Merge upstream block/buzz main into fork main (2026-09-04b)#139
yjc801 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
fork-sync/2026-09-04b

Conversation

@yjc801

@yjc801 yjc801 commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Second sync of the day (PR #136 landed the first). Merges 6 new upstream commits.

Merged upstream commits

Conflicts resolved (all in the known agent-mention seam)

  • useMentionSendFlow.types.tsgit rm'd as usual; upstream's new
    getComposerRevision / runComposerUpdate / effectiveDraftKey option
    fields ported into the fork's useMentionSendFlow.helpers.ts copy of
    UseMentionSendFlowOptions.
  • agentAutocompleteEligibility.ts — kept the fork's
    managedAgents: Iterable<ManagedAgentScopeInput> + activeCommunityRelayUrl
    community scoping, took upstream's new phase?: "prepare" | "publish" and
    its { type: "owned" } eligibility branch (which auto-merged).
  • useMentions.ts — dropped upstream's re-inlined mentionableAgentPubkeys
    memo and ported its diff (phase: "prepare", the DM owned scope) into the
    fork's useMentionAgentPubkeys extraction, which now takes channelId and
    channelType.
  • agentMentionRevalidation.ts — took upstream's AgentMentionAuthorizationError
    throw contract and its "each directory proves only its own identities"
    removal of the managed-directory veto, keeping the fork's roster fetch,
    accumulated directory provenance, and lenient member branch.
  • useMentionSendFlow.helpers.ts / .ts — plain add/add unions; kept the
    fork's getNonMemberMentionPubkeys alongside upstream's
    mentionRevalidationOptions / withoutInvitingRecipients.

Two conflict-free breaks the merge did not mark

  • useMentionSendFlow.test-support.mjs (new upstream file) asserts every
    dependency is stubbed; the fork's @/features/agents/channelAgentMutations
    extraction is not a module upstream knows about. The agent-hooks stub proxy
    is now shared by both specifiers.
  • The fork's revalidation tests asserted the old filter-and-return contract.
    Ported to assert.rejects(..., AgentMentionAuthorizationError).

One deliberate behavior narrowing

The fork previously denied every agent mention when the channel-roster
refetch failed. Upstream now throws on a denial rather than silently
dropping, and its rationale ("a failed local query must not veto fresh relay
evidence") applies to the roster too — which the fork's own comment already
says exists only to feed the lenient member branch. An unresolved roster now
withholds leniency (a member-only agent still fails closed, and now surfaces as
an authorization error instead of a silent drop) but no longer vetoes an agent
the relay directory independently admits. Both halves are covered by tests.

Validation

cargo check --workspace --all-targets, just test-unit (921 passed),
just desktop-tauri-check, just desktop-tauri-test, just fmt-check,
just file-size-check, desktop tsc --noEmit, pnpm test (6574 passed),
pnpm check, and scripts/test-desktop-instance-detection.sh (8 cases,
xyz.waggle.app.dev) all clean.

loganj and others added 7 commits September 4, 2026 11:51
…lock#7133)

## Summary

Selecting two people or agents named Scout could replace the first
recipient with the second even though the message still looked right.
This binds each selection to its exact identity: the first keeps
`@Scout`, and a conflicting selection gets `@Scout (<full public key>)`.
Removing one no longer removes or redirects the other.

- Reuse the existing **@ suggestion list**; team selection and automatic
agent addressing reserve and reuse distinct labels too. Typing an
ambiguous name manually shows an instruction to use the picker and
preserves the draft without publishing—in chat, edits and standalone
forums.
- Share literal mention matching across recipient extraction, removal,
display and editing so a shorter name cannot claim another recipient's
longer or qualified label.
- Rebuild authored references when a message is edited, and use the
latest authorized snapshot when reopening or forwarding.
Rendering/editing can recover qualified identities only from the
message's recorded references, not from a key typed into its body.
Unresolvable historical names remain literal rather than guessed
recipients.
- Wrap full-key labels within narrow/zoomed layouts while keeping their
complete accessible label and ordinary mention icons. Edit activation
waits for the action menu's focus cleanup before focusing the editor.

### Related issue

Targets `main`; mention spacing (block#7128) is already merged. Split from
block#7114. This is independent of the block#7124block#7125 remote-invitation stack
and does not expand agent eligibility or invitation permissions. The
separate Enter-selection suffix issue remains tracked in block#7253.

### Testing

The desktop unit suite and focused mock-Chromium checks passed on the
published integration candidate, including pending-paste selection,
edit/forwarding, copy and narrow-layout cases; formatting, types and
frontend builds passed. On `0b3b18c0`, 64 focused trust/paste/selection
unit tests and six mock-Chromium tests passed with zero browser retries,
including actual timeline chip copy → fresh channel paste → send and
mismatched-key rejection; TypeScript, changed-file Biome and an isolated
E2E build passed. The broader browser run had copy failures before the
focused repairs and is not claimed as wholly green. See [live
CI](https://github.com/block/buzz/pull/7133/checks) for current-head
results. No full local `just ci` pass, native/live-relay or
cross-browser validation is claimed.

To try it: select two same-name recipients, remove one, send, then
edit/reopen and forward; only the intended identities should remain.
Type an ambiguous name without choosing a suggestion and check that
sending retains the draft with an error. Inspect full-key labels in a
narrow window at 150% text size, and open Edit and type immediately.

![Ambiguous mention keeps the chat
draft](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/block/buzz/c48053209b36b3b1bf7197cf2d606d27b48a27c0/pr-7133--ambiguous-general.png)

![Full-key label in a narrow, zoomed
composer](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/block/buzz/ac262f00de6fe3860bff2f87dc0e98165ed6b651/pr-7133--layout-1.5-composer.png)

*Earlier mock-browser captures, not current-head runtime proof. No new
before-state capture; screenshots alone do not prove recipient
delivery.*

**Clipboard trust:** generated full-key-qualified mentions now retain
their exact recipient after copy/paste when the full key matches the
clipboard record and community directory/profile state independently
vouches for the base alias, including numeric collision suffixes. A
qualifier alone does not establish trust. Arbitrary historical labels
still cannot always be reconstructed.

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Bad Janet <150b20bdf6130418df9239dd1bd082c71612c8d653b47c277200365b9be215dc@buzz>
## Summary

Rename the paired persona prompt boundary from `<system>` to
`<agent-instructions>` in both modern and legacy ACP delivery paths.
Update Desktop diagnostics to label the new boundary as Agent
Instructions while keeping archived `<system>` captures readable.

`system` is confusing (esp with system role) and agent instructions is
what shows up in the UI today

<img width="767" height="298" alt="Screenshot 2026-09-04 at 11 37 54 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e34ac06-db50-461e-a555-ce17885b0031"
/>

### Related issue

Follow-up to block#6701. No duplicate open issue or PR found.

### Testing

- `cargo test -p buzz-acp`
- `cargo clippy -p buzz-acp --all-targets -- -D warnings`
- `node --import ./desktop/test-loader.mjs --experimental-strip-types
--test
desktop/src/features/agents/ui/agentSessionTranscriptHelpers.test.mjs
desktop/src/features/agents/ui/agentSessionTranscript.test.mjs`
- `pnpm --dir desktop typecheck`
- Pre-push hook: 6,237 Desktop tests, 3,164 Tauri tests, and all 13 Rust
unit-test lanes passed

Generated with Codex

Signed-off-by: Salman Mohammed <smohammed@squareup.com>
🤖

## Summary

In Buzz Desktop, you could own an agent running on another device but be
unable to mention it in a channel where it had not yet joined: it was
filtered out before you could invite it. A selected agent could also
disappear from the message's recipients when permissions changed. This
lets you select an eligible agent in the existing **@ menu**, invite it
from the message composer, and send to that agent—or see an error and
keep your draft rather than silently sending without it.

#### Where the experience changes

| Screen / control | Before → after |
| --- | --- |
| A channel's **Message #…** composer, or a message's **Reply in thread
to …** composer | Type `@` (or use the existing @ button), choose your
agent, write the message and press **Send message**. An owned agent not
yet in the channel can now reach the existing **“Mention people outside
this channel?”** dialog when its response settings allow you to address
it. |
| That dialog's **Invite** button | Previously the membership
requirement could block the agent before the invitation. Now Invite
checks permission to add it, adds it as an agent member of the
**channel** (not just the thread), then rechecks membership and response
permission before sending the waiting message. An agent already in the
channel needs no invitation. |
| Existing direct message, or the new-message screen with the **To:**
field | A mention is checked against the conversation the message will
actually enter, including a newly created direct message, rather than
the old or not-yet-created destination. This does not add an Invite
control to direct messages. |
| Editing a message / sending attachments | The selected agent remains
part of the send or edit attempt through attachment upload and the final
permission check. Lost permission produces a visible error instead of
dropping that recipient. |

**Invite is not the only chat choice.** The existing **Do nothing**
button sends the message *without inviting or notifying the nonmembers*;
their names remain references in the text. Where you cannot invite, that
choice is labelled **Send anyway**. To abandon the send instead, dismiss
the dialog with Escape. Invitation actions are disabled while
preparation is pending, preventing duplicate clicks.

**Leaving and returning must not resurrect a cancelled send.** Switching
threads or leaving the composer cancels its pending invitation, even if
you return to the same thread. Cancellation before dispatch sends no
message; an accepted membership change cannot be automatically undone.
An ordinary send without a pending invitation remains bound to its
original destination rather than following you into another
conversation.

**Failed sends must not overwrite your next draft.** If you leave a
thread, return and replace or deliberately clear its draft while an
older send is pending, the older failure cannot restore deleted text,
recipients or files; success cannot erase the newer draft—even if its
text is identical. An untouched draft cleared automatically for sending
remains recoverable on failure. This protection also covers reopening
the composer and starting a newer send.

The channel timeline also keeps its existing **new-messages / Jump to
latest** button available when newer messages are waiting to be
displayed. For example, after sharing a reply to the channel and closing
the thread panel, you can click the catch-up button to reveal buffered
messages. Closing the thread does **not** guarantee the shared row
appears automatically or force you away from reading history.

### Related issue

Built on [block#7122](block#7122), base branch
`split/owned-agent-discovery`, which lets Desktop find and verify owned
agents independently of this device. Current integration head:
`1144465d00273cf74b7c22544ae5a3299bd98560`, built on exact published
root `3a56d17824522580fe04cae463b54f4c7ba66021`. Root block#7122 has its own
CI and security gates; this PR must not land ahead of that dependency.
Finding an agent is not channel membership, online status or a promise
of a reply. This PR changes what the existing message controls can do
with those agents; it adds no profile, presence, cloud marker or remote
start/stop UI.

Standalone forum post/reply **Invite / Cancel** is added separately in
[block#7125](block#7125); here those composers
only gain visible authorization errors. Same-name selection/binding
fixes ([block#7133](block#7133)) and mention
spacing ([block#7128](block#7128)) are not
included.

Extracted from [block#7114](block#7114)
(historical source `98fe33ec`). [Behavior and draft-recovery
contract](https://github.com/block/buzz/blob/1144465d00273cf74b7c22544ae5a3299bd98560/docs/remote-mention-routing.md)
· [Originating
discussion](buzz://message?channel=f7a9536a-1738-4bad-a888-b3ea25010ef1&id=7aa1f0ab23dce514bd8a0221441cf005bf428914621171472b79747c50820848).

### Testing

![Channel composer after Send: RemoteScout is not a channel member;
Invite adds it before sending, while Do nothing sends without inviting
or notifying
it](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/block/buzz/b20345da0bd648ecbc78988637c89893a33ca2f3/pr-7124--remote-invite.png)

*Earlier candidate, mock desktop browser: the existing channel dialog
now reachable for an eligible owned agent on another device. The two
buttons have different send outcomes; Do nothing is not Cancel.*
[Success and denial
captures](block#7124 (comment))
· [Pending-state
capture](block#7124 (comment)).
These show the relevant UI, not live agent availability, native
authorization or the later draft-storage/catch-up repairs. No
before-state screenshot is available.

Existing coverage exercises exact recipients, invitation
rejection/cancellation, new direct-message destinations, uploads, edits,
thread re-entry and stored-draft deletion. The timeline regression
checks the shared reply becomes visible using the available catch-up
action.

**Integration validation (2026-09-02):** independently reviewed the
routing delta onto root `3a56d178`: seven original patches unchanged;
two reconciliations retain generic publication-error toasts alongside
authorization errors and retain non-authored editability updates. Added
two production-hook regression tests (normal and queued-media
publication) requiring visible generic error, recovered draft and
released pending state.

- Writer validation: **5,995 Desktop tests**, **42 focused tests**, **22
mock-IPC browser journeys** (18 routing, 2 root provenance, 2
destination binding), and **1 voice-note failure journey** passed; lint,
types, size guards and E2E build also passed.
- The broad suite ran before the final formatting-only test amendment,
not as an exact-final-head rerun. Independent AST comparison confirmed
that amendment is semantics-preserving; **4 fresh assertions at final
`1144465d`** passed. Publication rechecked final-head TypeScript,
amended-test formatting and `git diff --check` successfully. No new full
repository `just ci` run is claimed.
- Browser tests use an isolated E2E build and **mock IPC**, not live
relay/native authorization. Historical screenshots above are explicitly
earlier UI evidence, not exact-head runtime certification. Packaged
Tauri/live-relay behavior was not independently witnessed.
- **Published-head gates:** [current CI
run](https://github.com/block/buzz/actions/runs/33657948560) and
[renewed exact-head formal review
request](block#7124 (comment))
must clear before landing. [Earlier CI
run](https://github.com/block/buzz/actions/runs/33438436438) and the two
earlier approvals cover `7ffead0f`, not this new head. Root CI/security
clearance remains separate; the independent scoped integration approval
is not merge authorization.

To try it: in a channel or thread, select an owned nonmember agent,
Send, then Invite or Escape and retry. Deny the add or revoke its
response permission before sending: expect a visible error and
recoverable draft, not a message missing the agent. During a pending
send, return to the source thread, edit or clear the draft, then leave
again: late completion must not overwrite that choice.

**Limits:** permission checks and sending are separate operations;
cancellation cannot retract a dispatched message. Draft protection is
same-window, not new cross-window deletion synchronization. Standalone
forum transport failure can still restore text/media without the exact
selected recipients. Native compatibility is inherited: open-source
builds may still recognize a valid legacy, self-declared agent already
in the channel when verified ownership is absent or rejected; that does
not establish ownership or unlock this owned-nonmember invitation path.
Invalid policy from a verified owner is still rejected. No agent
response is guaranteed.

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
## Summary

In Desktop's standalone Forums, selecting an owned agent from another
device could leave a post or reply unsendable if the agent had not
joined the forum. This adds **Invite / Cancel** to the send flow so you
can resolve membership without leaving your draft.

- **Invite** checks response policy and your permission to add members,
adds the agent to the forum, waits for refreshed membership, then
rechecks authorization before posting to the original destination.
Membership is forum-wide, not limited to one post.
- **Cancel / Escape** keeps the text, attachments and selected
recipients for retry. Unlike chat's **Do nothing / Send anyway**, this
dialog has no reference-only send choice. Invite is disabled while
pending; Cancel remains available.
- Leaving the source post/reply cancels its pending invitation, even if
you return. Errors remain visible, focus returns to the initiating
editor when appropriate, and late completion cannot resume a cancelled
post or interfere with a newer attempt.
- A rejected send restores text, uploaded media and exact selected
recipients to the source draft only if no newer edit, deletion, upload
intent or send supersedes it. Clipboard verification settles before
recipient capture, with stale edits/navigation fenced out.

### Related issue

Targets `main` after block#7124 merged. This PR reuses its publication checks
and draft protection; the five forum commits have been replayed
unchanged onto the merged parent. Owned-agent discovery (block#7122) is
already merged. Split from block#7114.

Forum creation/templates, channel-less Notes and local-agent management
are unchanged. Duplicate-name binding from block#7133 is already merged and
retained by this stack. Inviting does not start a remote agent or
promise that it is online or will reply.

### Testing

Forum composer lifecycle tests, including clipboard-settlement cases,
and TypeScript/changed-file formatting checks passed after the restack.
Earlier invitation, focus and transport-recovery browser coverage is
retained, not claimed as a fresh full browser run on this head. See
[live CI](https://github.com/block/buzz/pull/7125/checks) for
current-head results. Browser evidence uses mock IPC; no full local
`just ci` pass or native/live-relay validation is claimed.

To try it: open a forum post or reply, select an owned nonmember agent
and send. Cancel, then retry without reselecting; Invite should add that
agent before posting. Deny the add to check the visible error and
retained draft. Navigate away/back during a pending invitation or
rejected send; no stale publication or overwrite of a newer draft should
occur.

![Forum invitation with Invite and
Cancel](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/block/buzz/6481bd088d661975672addcc834231df6ac88705/pr-7125--forum-invite.png)

*Earlier mock-browser capture, not current-head runtime proof. [Error
and successful-post
captures](block#7125 (comment));
no before-state/native capture available.*

**Limits:** cancellation cannot undo accepted membership changes or
dispatched posts; authorization and publication are not atomic. Recovery
is same-window, subject to browser storage limits, and is not a durable
in-flight send journal: reload/crash can lose a pending snapshot.
Cross-window coordination and in-flight upload custody are unchanged.
The parent's legacy member-agent compatibility does not establish
ownership for nonmember invitations.

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
…ion (block#7337)

## Problem

block#6732 added a busy-owner hold to the ACP harness: when a scope's
recorded session owner (`session_owners`) is checked out on **any**
turn, `dispatch_pending` holds the scope's batch instead of dispatching
it. The hold was added to keep one provider session per thread — but it
is unconditional: it applies to `Conversation` scopes too, and it has no
time bound.

Under the default `session_policy=channel`, every channel collapses to a
single `Conversation` scope, so once two channels' sessions land on the
same worker (pass 2 of `try_claim` picks the first idle worker by index,
so this happens quickly after any restart), channel A's mention starves
behind channel B's in-flight turn — for up to the full
`max_turn_duration` (7200s by default) — while other workers sit idle.
The only signal is a DEBUG-level log, and the 👀 seen-reaction is added
at queue admission *before* the hold decision, so the user sees the
agent acknowledge the mention and then nothing.

Observed in production on the first day of the v0.5.22 rollout: three
separate incidents where a mention got 👀 but no turn started until an
unrelated channel's turn ended on the shared worker (in the worst case
the blocking turn sat in a single tool call for 6+ minutes).

## Fix

One new seam, `AgentPool::hold_decision`, replaces the raw
`should_hold_for_busy_owner` check in `dispatch_pending` (the predicate
itself is unchanged and remains the inner check):

- **`Conversation` scopes never hold.** Channel-policy channels and all
DMs dispatch immediately; a busy owner means forking onto an idle
worker, exactly the pre-block#6732 behavior. This removes the cross-channel
head-of-line blocking entirely for the default policy.
- **`Thread` scopes hold for a bounded window.**
`HOLD_BUSY_OWNER_TIMEOUT` (10s) is measured from the first time the
batch is held (`held_since` stamp); once elapsed, the batch stops
holding and forks a fresh session on an idle worker, rebuilding thread
context from the relay. This preserves block#6732's session-continuity intent
for the momentary-busy case while capping the worst-case wait. No new
timer is needed: held batches are requeued with preserved timestamps and
re-evaluated on every dispatch trigger (turn end, relay event, 30s
maintenance tick), so the effective worst-case re-check gap on a fully
silent system is one maintenance tick.
- **Holds are observable.** Holding logs at INFO and a hold expiry logs
at WARN (previously DEBUG-only), and both emit observer-feed events
(`busy_owner_hold`, `busy_owner_hold_forked`) with the scope, owner
index, and held duration.

`held_since` is derived state and is cleared on every removal path:
dispatch/fork (inside `hold_decision`), `invalidate_channel_sessions`,
`invalidate_scope_session`, and `switch_idle_agent_model`.

## Accepted trade-offs

- A fork after an expired hold leaves the old owner's now-orphaned
thread session in its session map until natural rotation/invalidation —
benign, and identical to pre-block#6732 fork semantics (`loadSession: false`;
sessions are worker-pinned, so migration is not an option).
- Under sustained pool exhaustion the hold stamp is cleared on the fork
attempt and re-stamped next cycle, so the bound is effectively "timeout
after a worker frees up," not absolute wall clock.

## Tests

- New table test `hold_decision_covers_variant_session_busy_and_timeout`
over the full input space (scope variant × idle-session presence × owner
busyness × elapsed vs. window). The `Conversation` + busy-owner row is
the cross-channel regression guard; the past-window row guards the
bound. Both were mutation-checked: removing the variant gate or the
timeout branch fails the suite.
- `busy_session_owner_holds_batch_instead_of_forking_session` extended
with the Hold → ForkAfterHold transition, the `Conversation` dispatch
guard, and `held_since` pruning on channel invalidation.
- Scope-invalidation and idle-model-switch tests extended to cover
`held_since` cleanup alongside the existing `session_owners` assertions.

Signed-off-by: Will Pfleger <pfleger.will@gmail.com>
## What changed

Verify every Nostr EVENT received by buzz-acp immediately after
deserialization. Events with an invalid NIP-01 ID or Schnorr signature
are dropped before subscription routing, deduplication, replay-watermark
updates, membership handling, or either harness queue.

## Safety

Signature verification runs on the blocking pool so cryptographic work
does not block the relay task. A verification failure drops only that
event and keeps the connection available for subsequent valid traffic.
The existing observer-control verification remains as defense in depth.

Regression tests cover valid delivery; changed content, ID, signature,
pubkey, tags, and timestamp; a forged owner shutdown command with a
recomputed ID; forged membership notifications; and forged
observer-control events.

## Testing

cargo test -p buzz-acp

cargo clippy -p buzz-acp --all-targets -- -D warnings

just ci

---------

Signed-off-by: Jordan Mecom <jm@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Junchao Yan <yjc801@gmail.com>
@yjc801
yjc801 merged commit 043151f into main Sep 4, 2026
63 checks passed
@yjc801
yjc801 deleted the fork-sync/2026-09-04b branch September 4, 2026 21:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants