[valuecodes]

What

• Calls like runner.run() showed as closed doors even when runner is clearly one of the repository's own classes, so class-heavy code read as "the tool doesn't understand my code". The parser now types receivers syntactically: const x = new X(), annotations x: X / X<T> / X | null, constructor parameter properties, class fields (this.x.m(), this.#x.m()), and classes imported as values or with import type, including through barrels and type-only re-exports.
• It still never guesses. Overrides in subclasses (in the same file or other files) make the call ambiguous, listing every candidate. Members inherited across files are followed. A class inferred only from new is dropped once the module writes that name or field. Interfaces, unions, arrays and untyped receivers keep today's result.
• Measured on local repos, resolved calls rose 71 % on cli-agent-sandbox, 8 % on react-3d and 6 % on jev-on-air, with no growth in ambiguous calls.
• Type-only imports stay off ModuleNode.imports, so module links (area connections) are unchanged. ImportVia gains an optional instance flag. The bundled service example now reaches UserService.load from main, so its class lobby is gone; the lobby HUD test moved to the repo example's Session lobby.

How to test

pnpm typecheck
pnpm lint
pnpm knip
pnpm test
pnpm build
pnpm --filter web dev   # open ?code=service: main has a door to UserService.load

Security review

No security-impacting changes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-12T18:48:59.009846Z	27f0207	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 27f0207e8c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".