Skip to content

Conversation

@AlbertoSoutullo
Copy link
Contributor

Draft version of the 2026Q1 commitments.

I maintained old names, but I guess this can be changed to logos-* if necessary.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fbarbu15 fbarbu15 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM so far, left some minor comments
Will discuss it also with Ksr later this week and come back with final comments

### Blend benchmarking
> *Note*: This was moved from previous quarter
* fully qualified name: `vac:dst:nomos:2026q1-nomos-evaluation:nomos-blendnet-benchmarking`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think nomos in task name is overkill, I propose:
vac:dst:nomos:2026q1-nomos-evaluation:blendnet-benchmarking

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same for the others

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


Perform a comparison between nim-libp2p using quic and waku using mplex and yamux.

Schedule note: Dates reflect quarter bounds; update when actual timing is known.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe group the notes together




### nWaku v0.37 bandwidth regression
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this can be extracted in a separate PR if we need to merge it quicker

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nah its ok, don't worry

@fbarbu15
Copy link
Collaborator

fbarbu15 commented Dec 8, 2025

hi @AlbertoSoutullo
I've discussed with Ksr and we would need to add in both DST and QA a dedicated commitment for logos core evaluation

@AlbertoSoutullo
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @AlbertoSoutullo I've discussed with Ksr and we would need to add in both DST and QA a dedicated commitment for logos core evaluation

Perfect, tomorrow morning will update the PR with all the mentioned stuff c:

tags:
- "2026q1"
- "dst"
- "annoncoms"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be anoncomms, not annoncoms :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops

@AlbertoSoutullo AlbertoSoutullo marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2025 12:19
@AlbertoSoutullo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think everything is addressed. Let me know if you need something else!

Copy link
Collaborator

@fbarbu15 fbarbu15 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@AlbertoSoutullo AlbertoSoutullo merged commit 4585e14 into master Dec 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@AlbertoSoutullo AlbertoSoutullo deleted the dst-commitments branch December 9, 2025 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants