Skip to content

Conversation

@oech3
Copy link
Contributor

@oech3 oech3 commented Jan 31, 2026

Closes #10130

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cksum/b2sum. tests/cksum/b2sum is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum. tests/cksum/cksum is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-a. tests/cksum/cksum-a is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-base64. tests/cksum/cksum-base64 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-base64-untagged. tests/cksum/cksum-base64-untagged is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-c. tests/cksum/cksum-c is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-raw. tests/cksum/cksum-raw is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-sha3. tests/cksum/cksum-sha3 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@oech3 oech3 marked this pull request as draft January 31, 2026 10:55
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 31, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Comparing oech3:cksum-new (decabea) with main (eabb527)

Summary

✅ 142 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 180 skipped benchmarks1

Footnotes

  1. 180 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-base64-untagged. tests/cksum/cksum-base64-untagged is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-c. tests/cksum/cksum-c is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?

@oech3 oech3 force-pushed the cksum-new branch 2 times, most recently from c190aaa to 557af54 Compare January 31, 2026 12:13
@oech3

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cksum/cksum-c. tests/cksum/cksum-c is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Skip an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cksum family: Backport --text --tag and --binary --tag --untagged behavior from main of GNU

1 participant