SCAL-291756: Embed params to disable and hide spotter chat components#426
SCAL-291756: Embed params to disable and hide spotter chat components#426somechandra-thoughtspot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @somechandra-thoughtspot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the embedding capabilities by introducing new configuration options for the Spotter chat interface. Developers can now specify parameters to either disable interaction with or completely hide various chat components, such as connector resources, connectors, and the mode switcher. This provides greater flexibility in customizing the embedded experience to meet specific application requirements. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
commit: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces new spotterChatConfig options to control the visibility and interactivity of chat connector resources, chat connectors, and the chat mode switcher within embedded applications. The changes involve updating the SpotterChatViewConfig interface, adding new URL parameters, and implementing the logic to pass these configurations as URL parameters in AppEmbed, SpotterEmbed, and LiveboardEmbed classes. Corresponding unit tests were added for AppEmbed, SpotterEmbed, and LiveboardEmbed to verify these parameters are correctly applied. The reviewer noted that the new tests in app.spec.ts and liveboard.spec.ts contain significant code duplication and suggested refactoring them to use test.each for improved maintainability and readability, mirroring the approach already used in conversation.spec.ts.
eca5db0 to
2e6a04f
Compare
050ee9e to
23bb0d1
Compare
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Configuration for customizing Spotter chat input controls. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
updated spotter chat input controls
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I intentionally avoided using the updated keyword to keep the Chat Input controls simple, since chatSwitcherMode is used for Spotter 2 (which uses the non-updated chat input).
| * @group Embed components | ||
| * @version SDK: 1.46.0 | ThoughtSpot: 26.4.0.cl | ||
| */ | ||
| export interface SpotterChatInputViewConfig { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we use different naming. SpotterChatInputViewConfig can mean everything related to chat input and we already have other chat input config flags
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMO, Going forward, we should adopt this approach and keep it consistent across all Chat Input controls. While it may cause slight confusion for existing controls, we should separate and standardize Input controls moving ahead. WDYT?
9ba62f5 to
973ed91
Compare
|
LGTM |
973ed91 to
612aeb8
Compare
612aeb8 to
305e3dd
Compare
|
SonarQube Quality Gate
|
| * }, | ||
| * }) | ||
| * ``` | ||
| * @version SDK: 1.46.2 | ThoughtSpot: 26.4.0.cl |
| * }, | ||
| * }) | ||
| * ``` | ||
| * @version SDK: 1.46.2 | ThoughtSpot: 26.4.0.cl |








No description provided.