Skip to content

[Partition and Subsets dfs with loop]#1256

Open
takchiks wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
takchiks:master
Open

[Partition and Subsets dfs with loop]#1256
takchiks wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:masterfrom
takchiks:master

Conversation

@takchiks
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

Subsets (Subsets.java)

Your solution is correct and efficient. You have successfully implemented a backtracking approach that generates all subsets without duplicates. The code is clean and well-commented.

One minor improvement: Instead of creating a new ArrayList every time when adding to the result (which is necessary), you are already doing it correctly. However, note that the reference solution uses a different approach (choose and not choose) which also works. Your approach is iterative within the recursive function and uses a for loop to traverse the array. Both approaches are valid.

You might consider adding a base case for the recursion, although it is not strictly necessary because the for loop condition will terminate when i >= nums.length. However, explicitly handling the base case can sometimes make the code clearer.

Also, the variable name "pivot" might be a bit misleading. It represents the starting index for the current recursive call. A more common name is "index" or "start". But this is a minor point.

Overall, excellent job!

VERDICT: PASS


Palindrome Partitioning (Parttion.java)

Strengths:

  • The solution correctly implements the backtracking algorithm for palindrome partitioning.
  • The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to understand.
  • The use of helper functions improves modularity and readability.
  • The time and space complexity analysis is accurate.

Areas for Improvement:

  • While the solution is correct, there is a minor inefficiency in repeatedly creating substrings for palindrome checks. Each call to s.substring(pivot, i + 1) creates a new string, which can be avoided by using indices to check palindromic property without substring creation. This would reduce memory overhead.
  • The palindrome check function could be optimized by passing the original string and indices (start and end) instead of creating a substring. This would avoid unnecessary string copies and improve performance, especially for longer strings.
  • The variable names L and R in isPalindrome could be more descriptive (e.g., left and right).
  • The method helperPartition could be renamed to something more concise like backtrack for brevity.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants