Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2022. It is now read-only.

Add support for maxConcurrency parameter in SqsListener#380

Open
ngaya-ll wants to merge 4 commits into
spring-attic:mainfrom
ngaya-ll:feature/max-concurrency
Open

Add support for maxConcurrency parameter in SqsListener#380
ngaya-ll wants to merge 4 commits into
spring-attic:mainfrom
ngaya-ll:feature/max-concurrency

Conversation

@ngaya-ll

@ngaya-ll ngaya-ll commented Oct 4, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

See issue for background.

Fixes gh-379

@pivotal-issuemaster

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ngaya-ll Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@pivotal-issuemaster

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ngaya-ll Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Oct 4, 2018
@ngaya-ll

ngaya-ll commented Oct 5, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Pinging @alainsahli, @aemruli as the primary authors of SimpleMessageListenerContainer.

@spencergibb spencergibb added status: in-progress An issue that being worked on and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 29, 2019
@reachkrishnaraj

Copy link
Copy Markdown

It would be great to have each listener assign its own TaskExecutor with its own configs like concurrency, polling config etc.,

@mateuszmrozewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ngaya-ll, could you resolve the conflicts, please? It's been a while since you prepared the PR, but maybe we can get the project owner attention and get that merged. This is a crucial improvement.

@nickcaballero

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Seems like this PR was abandoned but it has a lot of value. The other alternative is to use the JMS library from AWS which supports multiple listeners. @ngaya-ll, if you don't mind I can pick up where you left off with this work? Or maybe you can get the conflicts resolved and move this forward?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

component: sqs SQS integration related issue status: in-progress An issue that being worked on

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decouple concurrency and message batch size in SQS listener

8 participants