Preserve fields when sampling one dictionary - #717
Merged
juarezr merged 2 commits intoSep 21, 2026
Merged
Conversation
PR Summary by QodoPreserve fields when sampling one dictionary
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (3)
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTip of the day💡 Did you know, you can group findings by type and pick your Finding display, from Minimal to Full |
Coverage Report for CI Build 35546477051Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 92.104%Details
Uncovered ChangesNo uncovered changes found. Coverage RegressionsNo coverage regressions found. Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
juarezr
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fromdicts([{'id': '001'}], sample=1)currently yields[(), ()]: both the discovered header and all field values disappear. Passing the same data as a generator gives a different result. Empty inputs withsample=1also raiseRuntimeError, and the same problems affect JSON array input.iterpeek(..., 1)returns a single object rather than a list. Header discovery then iterates the dictionary's keys as though they were sampled records. Collect the sample withisliceand replay it withchain, in both ordinary and cached-generator header discovery. Sample sizes 0 and greater than 1 retain their existing behavior; records used for discovery remain available as data rows.Validation
Windows / Python 3.12.14, based on master
9a0b8448228b2575713dce93dacfc8451a4152b9:python -m pytest petl -q --tb=short --disable-warnings: 606 passed, 16 skipped, with five database-related warnings. Optional external integrations and the full tox matrix were not exercised locally.This is separate from #716: that PR fixes empty JSON Lines; this fixes sampled dictionary/JSON-array header discovery and does not include the #716 commits.
Checklist
d199558; the separate CodeQL workflow also succeeded.No new public function is introduced.