-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
[OSDOCS#17598]: Added new module for removing device and device classes for 4.21 #105230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OSDOCS#17598]: Added new module for removing device and device classes for 4.21 #105230
Conversation
ae9b28f to
f6eb9a7
Compare
|
🤖 Fri Jan 30 14:07:04 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
|
@qJkee and @mmakwana30 - This is the new PR for addition of new topic Removal of devices and device classes from LVMS. Kindly review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks pretty good. Some suggestions. I assume that this is one of your first/early PRs so nice job.
Make sure that the WARNINGS need to be warnings and not IMPORTANT; I'm not sure how this CR works really. Here's the link to the differences:
https://redhat-documentation.github.io/supplementary-style-guide/#admonitions
You could also do something like make "Removing the device paths in the deviceSelector.paths field" a level 2 subheading under "About removing devices and device classes from a volume group". For example:
= About removing devices and device classes from a volume group
== Removing the device paths in the deviceSelector.paths field
== Removing the deviceClass from the LVMCluster
in the same module. It's kind of up to you. Just an idea.
This will need QE ack before I can merge.
modules/lvms-about-removing-devices-deviceclasses-from-a-vg.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/lvms-about-removing-devices-deviceclasses-from-a-vg.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/lvms-about-removing-devices-deviceclasses-from-a-vg.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
a5094b1 to
9690d57
Compare
|
/lgtm |
|
@stevsmit - both Dev and QA reviewed the content and added /lgtm tag. When we are merging 4.21 content, we can merge this PR as well. |
modules/lvms-about-removing-devices-deviceclasses-from-a-vg.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
9690d57 to
4b5b442
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
61b29d5 to
cc439c5
Compare
bjahagir-OpenShift
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implemented review comments from Steven
|
/label merge-review-needed |
cc439c5 to
c09775c
Compare
c09775c to
0d8ff0f
Compare
|
@bjahagir-OpenShift: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.21 |
|
@stevsmit: new pull request created: #105749 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s):
4.21
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-17598
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1698
Link to docs preview:
https://105230--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/storage/persistent_storage_local/persistent-storage-using-lvms.html#about-removing-devices-deviceclasses-from-a-vg_logical-volume-manager-storage
QE review:
Additional information: