Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10249

/assign barbacbd

…ct Endpoint

** While the regional support is valid, we will not be using this in openshift. Regional support
requires that each api have its own endpoint. Only one api is associated with an endpoint, and managing
this access will be difficult and unnessary at this time.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74363 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74414. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-74414: Remove region option for the GCP Private Service Connect Endpoint

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10249

/assign barbacbd

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-74363: Remove region option for the GCP Private Service Connect Endpoint [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-74414: Remove region option for the GCP Private Service Connect Endpoint Jan 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74414, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74363 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.22" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10249

/assign barbacbd

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74414, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74363 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.22" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jan 26, 2026

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74414, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74414, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74363 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74363 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianli-wei

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jianli-wei January 26, 2026 14:55
Copy link
Contributor

@barbacbd barbacbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: barbacbd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2026
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jan 26, 2026

/label backport-risk-assessed

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Jan 26, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 26, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2026

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants