feat: add rules to block out most bot traffic#195
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 56 minutes and 50 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
Crawler Blocking
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/public/robots.txt (1)
4-4: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueBroaden comment to reflect all blocked bots.
The comment states "Block Semrush crawlers" but
SiteAuditBot(also used by other SEO platforms) andRyteBot(Ryte GmbH, not Semrush) are unrelated to Semrush. Update the comment to avoid implying all listed bots are Semrush-owned.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@apps/web/public/robots.txt` at line 4, The comment in robots.txt is too narrow because it implies all blocked crawlers are Semrush-owned, but the list also includes unrelated bots like SiteAuditBot and RyteBot. Update the comment near the robots directives to describe the broader set of blocked SEO crawlers, using the existing bot names in the file as the reference point, so it accurately reflects all entries without mentioning Semrush specifically.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@apps/web/public/robots.txt`:
- Line 4: The comment in robots.txt is too narrow because it implies all blocked
crawlers are Semrush-owned, but the list also includes unrelated bots like
SiteAuditBot and RyteBot. Update the comment near the robots directives to
describe the broader set of blocked SEO crawlers, using the existing bot names
in the file as the reference point, so it accurately reflects all entries
without mentioning Semrush specifically.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 56b12ed4-c074-41cd-808d-c7efe138f935
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/public/robots.txt
Summary by CodeRabbit