[ISSUE #10607]🐛Client runtime ownership tests expect internal error text in public - #10608
Conversation
…or text in public
|
🔊@WaterWhisperer 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe ownership tests now validate ChangesClient runtime ownership test assertions
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other · Severity of issue fixed: Low Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This test-only change improves validation without altering production behavior or introducing merge-blocking risk. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checks each error twice Comment |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit