Update uv to 0.12.24 across the project

[Kludex]

Use uv 0.12.24 in every GitHub Actions job, including publishing. Retain the existing compatible minimum so the docs preview, whose workflow runs from the base branch, continues to work before these workflow updates land.

Validation: pre-commit checks for the changed files and lockfile consistency pass.

AI Disclaimer

This PR was developed with the assistance of either Claude or Codex. I've reviewed and verified the changes.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-12T11:51:01.484149Z	b663b3e	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[github-actions]

📚 Documentation preview

Preview	https://pr-3689.mcp-python-docs.pages.dev
Deployment	https://ae008174.mcp-python-docs.pages.dev
Commit	0681f11
Triggered by	@Kludex
Updated	2026-10-12 12:11:43 UTC

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 6 files

_{Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic}

[claude]

LGTM, straightforward CI version bump.

What was reviewed:

• All eight setup-uv version: inputs now agree on 0.12.24; the action SHA pin and enable-cache settings are untouched, and no stray 0.9.5/0.12.5 references remain outside pyproject.toml's intentionally retained required-version floor.
• Lockfile compatibility: the test matrix in shared.yml was already on 0.12.24 and runs uv sync --frozen / uv run --frozen against the same uv.lock (revision 5), so this version already exercises the committed lock on every PR.
• uv lock --check in the pre-commit job now runs under 0.12.24; this PR's own CI run covers that before merge.
• docs-preview.yml syncing older PR heads and v1.x with 0.12.24: uv reads older lock revisions and the kept >=0.9.5 floor is satisfied, so no regression expected from the floor side.

Extended reasoning...

The net diff touches only five GitHub Actions workflow files, changing the version: input of astral-sh/setup-uv to 0.12.24 in eight jobs; pyproject.toml and uv.lock are unchanged in the net diff. It touches no application code and no security-sensitive surface (the action SHA pins, persist-credentials: false, and cache settings are untouched; the publish job only moves from 0.12.5 to 0.12.24). Approval was decided by the change being purely mechanical, the test matrix already running the identical uv version against the same lockfile, the absence of a CODEOWNERS file, and the hunt exiting on dry_streak with no outstanding CHANGES_REQUESTED review in the timeline.

[Kludex]

/preview-docs