Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Giles Cope <gilescope@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Closing as unnecessary. Nought wrong with the idea though. |
Contributor
Author
|
reopening in case we need this. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backward compatible and should sync well due to historical path data taken into account.
Even if there was a non-deterministic block produced, this would get passed it eventually.
UPDATE: now that 0.22.2 has been rolled out to > 33% of preprod it's not a moving target and this is not needed.
#735