Ops 5761 annotation fix

[mykola-kopyl]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated repository configuration.

---

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes. The modification is an internal administrative update.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds a .github/CODEOWNERS file that establishes code ownership rules for the repository. The file assigns review responsibility for all files to two groups, requiring both to approve changes before merge.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title references ticket OPS-5761 but the actual change only involves updating the CODEOWNERS file with ownership rules, which is unrelated to any annotation fix.	Update the title to accurately reflect the change, such as 'Add/update CODEOWNERS file with repository ownership rules' or similar description matching the actual file modifications.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch OPS-5761-annotation-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/CODEOWNERS:
- Around line 1-2: The CODEOWNERS file references non-existent teams
(`@mend/r-d-repo` and `@mend/r-d-devops`) so it won’t assign reviewers; either
create those two teams in the GitHub organization or update the CODEOWNERS entry
to reference existing teams/users; edit the CODEOWNERS file entry that currently
lists "* `@mend/r-d-repo` `@mend/r-d-devops`" to use valid team slugs (or individual
usernames) so GitHub can enforce the intended review requirements.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b81a5f22-e761-4e42-a1d7-602c221a4423

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da22cc4 and 1d88091.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CODEOWNERS

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the teams referenced in CODEOWNERS exist in the organization

echo "Checking if `@mend/r-d-repo` exists..."
if gh api orgs/mend/teams/r-d-repo --silent 2>/dev/null; then
  echo "✓ Team `@mend/r-d-repo` exists"
else
  echo "✗ Team `@mend/r-d-repo` does NOT exist"
fi

echo "Checking if `@mend/r-d-devops` exists..."
if gh api orgs/mend/teams/r-d-devops --silent 2>/dev/null; then
  echo "✓ Team `@mend/r-d-devops` exists"
else
  echo "✗ Team `@mend/r-d-devops` does NOT exist"
fi

Repository: mend/docker-base-images

Length of output: 219

---

The CODEOWNERS file references non-existent teams and will not enforce code review requirements.

The teams @mend/r-d-repo and @mend/r-d-devops do not exist in the GitHub organization. GitHub will silently ignore non-existent teams in CODEOWNERS, meaning this file will not assign reviewers or enforce code review as intended. Create these teams in the organization or update the file to reference existing teams.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/CODEOWNERS around lines 1 - 2, The CODEOWNERS file references
non-existent teams (`@mend/r-d-repo` and `@mend/r-d-devops`) so it won’t assign
reviewers; either create those two teams in the GitHub organization or update
the CODEOWNERS entry to reference existing teams/users; edit the CODEOWNERS file
entry that currently lists "* `@mend/r-d-repo` `@mend/r-d-devops`" to use valid team
slugs (or individual usernames) so GitHub can enforce the intended review
requirements.