Repository navigation
Prepare v13 tag for Lua 5.5.1 #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
779fe66
ci: update matrix to current Lua and LuaJIT states
luau-project 1a7c090
refactor(main.js): resolve `5.5` alias to `5.5.1`
luau-project cf35432
refactor(main.js): remove `luajit-2.1.0-beta3` from `LUAJIT_REPOS`
luau-project 7cef6b7
docs: update README for new versions
luau-project a78238b
chore(README): fix typos
luau-project File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one could be a breaking change for people. But I assume they could change it to
luajit-2.1and get (mostly?) equivalent behavior.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trying to install LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3 was failing for users as well (see lunarmodules/copas#197).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, deleting tags is a pretty nuclear option for making people upgrade.
But the Lua community, ever since the Lua/LuaJIT split around 5.2 (gosh, that was... 15 years ago!?), has gotten in this paralyzing tendency of supporting old versions forever, even when upstream doesn't support them anymore. We should really be (gradually?) moving into supporting only the latest PUC-Rio Lua and the latest LuaJIT, at best.
If people want to be using very very old versions of Lua, they should be using very very old versions of the supporting ecosystem as well, and not forcing maintainers into supporting 20+ years of legacy at all times.