waves/coherent_wave/profiles_1d/ion/state/power_inside_fast is named for the
fast population, but its description says the absorbed power lands on the
thermal one:
Absorbed wave power on thermal species inside a flux surface (cumulative
volume integral of the absorbed power density)
The power_inside_thermal sibling carries that same sentence word for word, so
the two fields cannot be told apart from their documentation. The neighbouring
power_density_fast does describe absorption on the fast species, which
suggests the recipient word is what is wrong rather than the field name.
The unit W is right for a cumulative volume integral and needs no change.
Suggested wording:
Absorbed wave power on the fast particle population inside a flux surface
(cumulative volume integral of the absorbed power density)
power_inside_fast_n_phi carries the same thermal wording and needs the same
correction. Both are defined in schemas/waves/dd_waves.xsd.
waves/coherent_wave/profiles_1d/ion/state/power_inside_fastis named for thefast population, but its description says the absorbed power lands on the
thermal one:
The
power_inside_thermalsibling carries that same sentence word for word, sothe two fields cannot be told apart from their documentation. The neighbouring
power_density_fastdoes describe absorption on the fast species, whichsuggests the recipient word is what is wrong rather than the field name.
The unit
Wis right for a cumulative volume integral and needs no change.Suggested wording:
power_inside_fast_n_phicarries the same thermal wording and needs the samecorrection. Both are defined in
schemas/waves/dd_waves.xsd.