Repository navigation
Conversation
sairex53
requested review from
brendangregg,
chenhengqi,
ekyooo and
yonghong-song
as code owners
October 20, 2026 05:32
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
memleakcurrently builds allocator probe names by prepending--symbols-prefixto standard names. That does not cover allocators such as jemalloc 5.3, where the relevant entry points can beje_malloc_defaultandje_free_default.Add
--malloc-symboland--free-symbolto both Python and libbpfmemleak. The exact names override the corresponding prefixed defaults. Add regression coverage for allocations and frees through custom symbols, and document the options.Fixes #5392.
Testing:
make -C libbpf-tools memleak— passedgit diff --check— passedpyroute2is missing and the session has no effective BPF privileges.