Update Rust crate libp2p-core to v0.43.2

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
libp2p-core	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.43.1 -> 0.43.2

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

libp2p/rust-libp2p (libp2p-core)

v0.43.2

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Dependency updates only.

• Bump libp2p-core to 0.43.2 (Cargo.lock update)
• Lockfile refresh, including data-encoding-macro-internal now pinning syn 1.0.109

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 614d0e9. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the resolved Rust dependency libp2p-core from 0.43.1 to 0.43.2.


Changes: Refreshes Cargo.lock accordingly (new checksum/version entries and updated transitive resolution, e.g. syn selection).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.89%. Comparing base (06cc531) to head (614d0e9).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.90%   58.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1193     1193              
  Lines      112723   112723              
  Branches     5013     5013              
==========================================
- Hits        66394    66393       -1     
- Misses      45571    45572       +1     
  Partials      758      758              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.695 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.602 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.621 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$416 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$278 \mathrm{ms} \pm 761 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.503 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-44.253 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$599 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.34 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph