Skip to content

Conversation

@ohmayr
Copy link
Contributor

@ohmayr ohmayr commented Feb 2, 2026

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @ohmayr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the post-processing logic for Google Cloud Python client library generation. It introduces more consistent import patterns for protobuf definitions, specifically transitioning to import ... as ... syntax. Additionally, it cleans up generated code by removing unnecessary imports and updates import paths to align with versioned API namespaces, enhancing the overall quality and maintainability of the generated client libraries.

Highlights

  • Standardized Import Syntax: Modified post-processing rules to change from <module> import <name> to import <module> as <name> for various protobuf-related modules, including policy_pb2, severity_pb2, and attestation_pb2, across multiple client libraries.
  • Removed Unused Imports: Updated post-processing configurations to remove specific unused import statements from generated test files, improving code cleanliness and reducing potential clutter.
  • Updated Versioned Namespace Imports: Adjusted import rules for gkehub to correctly reference modules within versioned API namespaces, ensuring compatibility and proper module resolution for generated client libraries.
Changelog
  • .librarian/generator-input/client-post-processing/containeranalysis-grafeas-integration.yaml
    • Changed from google.iam.v1 import policy_pb2 to import google.iam.v1.policy_pb2 as policy_pb2.
    • Changed from grafeas.v1 import severity_pb2 to import grafeas.v1.severity_pb2 as severity_pb2.
  • .librarian/generator-input/client-post-processing/proto-plus-dependency-with-modified-namespace.yaml
    • Changed from grafeas.v1 import attestation_pb2 to import grafeas.v1.attestation_pb2 as attestation_pb2.
    • Changed from google.iam.v2 import policy_pb2 to import google.iam.v2.policy_pb2 as policy_pb2.
  • .librarian/generator-input/client-post-processing/remove-unused-imports.yaml
    • Removed imports for configmanagement_pb2 and multiclusteringress_pb2 from gkehub test files.
    • Removed imports for attestation_pb2 and common_pb2 from binaryauthorization test files.
  • .librarian/generator-input/client-post-processing/sub-api-versioned-namespace.yaml
    • Updated imports for configmanagement_pb2 and multiclusteringress_pb2 in gkehub to use from google.cloud.gkehub_v1 import ... syntax.
Activity
  • The pull request was opened by ohmayr.
  • The description includes a standard template for PR submission guidelines.
  • No specific human activity (comments, reviews, approvals) has been recorded yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates several YAML configuration files that appear to be part of a code generation post-processing pipeline. The changes consistently update Python import statements within these configurations, moving from a from ... import ... style to import ... as .... This refactoring is applied to the search patterns (before: blocks) and, where necessary, the replacement patterns (after: blocks) to maintain consistency. These changes seem to be a necessary maintenance step to align the post-processing rules with a new format from an upstream code generator. The new import style is generally clearer and less prone to namespace conflicts. The changes are consistent and correctly implemented across all files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant