chore: re-add replaces for development

[julienrbrt]

Overview

Re-add the apps replaces for development, now that v1.0.0 is tagged.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@julienrbrt has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6a9516e4-2788-4b6a-9043-55f6fefc9046

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6bbca6 and 44e4efc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• apps/evm/go.mod
• apps/testapp/go.mod

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch julien/chore

📝 Coding Plan for PR comments

• Generate coding plan

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[claude]

Claude finished @julienrbrt's task in 1m 25s —— View job

---

Code Review

• Gather context and analyze PR changes
• Review go.mod changes
• Provide final assessment

---

Summary

This PR re-adds local replace directives to apps/evm/go.mod and apps/testapp/go.mod for development, following the pattern already present in apps/grpc/go.mod. The previous bump commit (#3160) had commented them out; this restores them as active replace blocks.

Changes Reviewed

apps/evm/go.mod — Adds:

replace (
    github.com/evstack/ev-node => ../../
    github.com/evstack/ev-node/execution/evm => ../../execution/evm
)

apps/testapp/go.mod — Adds:

replace github.com/evstack/ev-node => ../../.

Observations

Correctness: The replace directives are valid relative paths within this monorepo and are consistent with the existing pattern in apps/grpc/go.mod. Nothing suspicious here.

Minor inconsistency (non-blocking): apps/testapp/go.mod uses ../../. while apps/evm/go.mod uses ../../. These are functionally equivalent, but normalizing to ../../ (without the trailing dot) would be slightly cleaner for consistency.

Missing core replace: Neither apps/evm nor apps/testapp adds a replace for github.com/evstack/ev-node/core, even though it's a direct dependency in both. However, this matches the pattern in apps/grpc/go.mod, so it appears intentional — core likely doesn't need local replacement in the current dev workflow.

go.sum cleanup: The corresponding entries were removed from go.sum files as expected when switching from resolved versions to local paths.

Verdict

The changes are straightforward and correct. This follows the established monorepo development pattern. LGTM.

[github-actions]

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).

Build	Format	Lint	Breaking	Updated (UTC)
✅ passed	⏩ skipped	✅ passed	✅ passed	Mar 12, 2026, 4:48 PM

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.20%. Comparing base (d6bbca6) to head (3efc8c2).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3161   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.20%   60.20%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines       11896    11896           
=======================================
  Hits         7162     7162           
  Misses       3923     3923           
  Partials      811      811           

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	60.20% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[alpe]

👍