Repository navigation
ci/tmt-tests: pin runner to ubuntu-24.04 - #1179
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Update job runner .github/workflows/tmt-tests.yml |
The tmt-tests job runner changes from ubuntu-latest to ubuntu-24.04. |
Priority:
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
Change: Other
Suggested reviewers: c4rt0
Merge Risk: 
Minimal · up to 62842
-
The workflow runner update is ready to merge with no identified impact on the test workflow.
Pre-merge checks: 
4 · 
1
-
Failed checks: 1 warning Passed checks: 4 passedFull details: Commit Message Convention
-
Explanation
The PR has one non-merge commit:
dnm: try pin ubuntu-24.04. The description is lowercase, imperative, and has no trailing period. However,dnmis a review-status marker, not the subsystem for the changed.github/workflows/tmt-tests.ymlfile. The repository usesci:for workflow changes.Resolution
Amend the commit subject to use the workflow subsystem, for example
ci: pin ubuntu-24.04orci: try pin ubuntu-24.04.
-
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
497c8b1 to
62842ff
Compare
This is to avoid a known issue with ubuntu-26.04, where the tear down of
the container used by this TMT CI is failing with:
* rootless netns: kill network process: permission denied
62842ff to
1e7926f
Compare
|
ran into this in chaoss/8Knot. It's an AppArmor issue in Ubuntu 26.04 (pasta's profile doesn't let podman stop it): https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2154379 opened an issue on the runner image with a workaround: actions/runner-images#15182 |
This is to avoid a known issue with ubuntu-26.04, where the tear down of
the container used by this TMT CI is failing with:
I don't have too much understanding of what actually causes the issue but https://computingforgeeks.com/podman-cheat-sheet/ suggests it's related to AppArmor