Fix macros for <experimental/simd> usage - #139
Merged
Merged
Conversation
christianparpart
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2026
christianparpart
left a comment
christianparpart
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nice, many thanks, @barracuda156
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #138
Both modern macOS and modern FreeBSD use
libc++, and the intention of existing macros seem to avoidexperimental/simdis those cases, but that breaks the build with gcc that useslibstdc++by default, and needs to useexperimental/simd.If you prefer, the change can be minimized to
P. S. I only tested on macOS, I rely on documentation that FreeBSD defines
_LIBCPP_VERSION(it is a standard macro forlibc++detection, not platform-specific.