ln-simln-jamming: bump sim-ln dependency to include exclude fix#116
Merged
ln-simln-jamming: bump sim-ln dependency to include exclude fix#116
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Updating to include changes in: bitcoin-dev-project/sim-ln#305 |
With this version on sim-ln, we'll no longer include the attacker's "excluded" channels in our random activity generation. This prevents the simulation from sending more payments in the attack time graph than it would it the peacetime graph (which would make us over-estimate revenue under attack).
carlaKC
force-pushed
the
simln-version-exclude-channels
branch
from
27cdd15 to
56d4db6
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With this version on sim-ln, we'll no longer include the attacker's "excluded" channels in our random activity generation. This prevents the simulation from sending more payments in the attack time graph than it would it the peacetime graph (which would make us over-estimate revenue under attack).