docs: fix typos and inaccuracies in README, guides, and designreview prompts

[Emillock]

Summary

Documentation-only refresh rebuilt on the current main branch. The PR now contains only still-relevant wording and administrative-guide fixes; it does not touch aidlc-rules/ and does not reintroduce the removed scripts/aidlc-designreview/ tree.

Changes

• README: corrected the Method Definition Paper reference, Codex verification prompt, resiliency wording, and Claude Code capitalization.
• CONTRIBUTING: corrected PowerShell capitalization.
• Developers Guide: clarified GH_TOKEN setup and aligned security-scanner behavior with the current workflow.
• Administrative Guide: documents all nine current workflows, including ci.yml, codeql.yml, and docs.yml; aligns triggers, environments, permissions, scanner thresholds, and result publication with the current workflow YAML.

Scope

Only these four files change:

• README.md
• CONTRIBUTING.md
• docs/ADMINISTRATIVE_GUIDE.md
• docs/DEVELOPERS_GUIDE.md

Validation

• npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 README.md CONTRIBUTING.md docs/ADMINISTRATIVE_GUIDE.md docs/DEVELOPERS_GUIDE.md: 0 issues.
• Confirmed exactly nine workflow files under .github/workflows/.
• git diff --check: clean.
• Independent factual review against every current workflow YAML: no findings.

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the project license.

[scottschreckengaust]

Hi @Emillock thank you for your contribution! We triage based on GitHub issues and like to keep changes to rules even grammar managed closely. Would you consider sending a "documentation only" version separately outside of the rules and log others as bugs or suggestions? Thanks!

[Emillock]

Hello @scottschreckengaust. Thanks for the guidance! I have reworked this PR in place to be the documentation-only version: it now touches only README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, docs/, and the designreview prompt files, with nothing under aidlc-rules/. The title and description are updated to match.

The rules-related findings are logged as issues instead:

• [Bug]: Rule files reference stages that do not exist in the current workflow ("Unit Design Generation", "NFR Implementation") #588 (bug): rule files reference stages that do not exist in the current workflow
• [Docs]: Small factual and wording errors in rule files #589 (docs): small factual and wording errors in rule files
• [Feature]: Deduplicate the User Stories assessment out of core-workflow.md #590 (suggestion): deduplicate the User Stories assessment out of core-workflow.md
• [Feature]: Strip presentation styling from model-facing Mermaid diagrams #591 (suggestion): strip presentation styling from model-facing Mermaid diagrams

Each issue links to a reference branch on my fork in case that is useful during triage.

One scoping question: I kept the scripts/aidlc-designreview prompt-fence fix here since it is outside aidlc-rules/, but it is tool configuration rather than pure documentation. Happy to drop it from this PR and file it as an issue too if you would prefer.

[leandrodamascena]

Rebuilt this PR on current main and removed all obsolete changes. The branch now contains one documentation-only commit (b96abed0), touches exactly four files, documents all nine current workflows, and does not reintroduce scripts/aidlc-designreview/. Markdown lint, workflow inventory, diff checks, and an independent workflow-YAML review are clean.

[leandrodamascena]

Thanks for working on this @Emillock! Approved.

[apackeer]

Reviewed the documentation-only changes against the current workflow definitions. No blocking issues found.