Skip to content

Conversation

@SahilAujla
Copy link
Collaborator

@SahilAujla SahilAujla commented Jan 30, 2026

Summary

  • Inline eth_callMany, eth_getAccount, and eth_getRawTransactionByHash method definitions in MegaETH spec
  • Replace shared references with MegaETH-specific examples
  • Update example request/response values with actual MegaETH mainnet data

Inline eth_callMany, eth_getAccount, and eth_getRawTransactionByHash
method definitions with MegaETH-specific examples instead of using
shared references. This provides accurate example values for MetaMask
integration.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 30, 2026 02:26
@SahilAujla SahilAujla requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2026 02:26
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 30, 2026

🌿 Documentation Preview

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Alchemy Docs ✅ Ready 🔗 Visit Preview Jan 30, 2026, 2:28 AM

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to docs-preview January 30, 2026 02:27 Destroyed
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR inlines MegaETH-specific API method definitions instead of using shared references, allowing for customized examples with actual MegaETH mainnet data for MetaMask integration.

Changes:

  • Inlined eth_callMany, eth_getAccount, and eth_getRawTransactionByHash method definitions with full parameter and result schemas
  • Replaced generic shared references with MegaETH-specific examples using mainnet addresses and transaction data
  • Updated example values to demonstrate real-world MegaETH usage patterns

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 45477054f0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant