Skip to content

Improve the branch selection in interactive go (now same as status)#1607

Open
PawelLipski wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
improve/go-interactive-status
Open

Improve the branch selection in interactive go (now same as status)#1607
PawelLipski wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
improve/go-interactive-status

Conversation

@PawelLipski
Copy link
Collaborator

@PawelLipski PawelLipski commented Mar 9, 2026

Based on PR #1611

Chain of upstream PRs as of 2026-03-12

@PawelLipski PawelLipski self-assigned this Mar 9, 2026
@PawelLipski PawelLipski added this to the v3.39.2 milestone Mar 9, 2026
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 3 times, most recently from b989059 to def3a7a Compare March 9, 2026 13:17
@PawelLipski PawelLipski changed the base branch from develop to refactor/branches_in_display_order March 9, 2026 13:42
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 2 times, most recently from 3406b05 to 7aa07f1 Compare March 9, 2026 14:06
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.72%. Comparing base (bd4a773) to head (044a126).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1607      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    98.68%   98.72%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           28       28              
  Lines         4791     4793       +2     
  Branches       897      894       -3     
===========================================
+ Hits          4728     4732       +4     
+ Misses          39       38       -1     
+ Partials        24       23       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 2 times, most recently from 58cd772 to 6835753 Compare March 10, 2026 11:22
Base automatically changed from refactor/branches_in_display_order to develop March 10, 2026 11:28
@PawelLipski PawelLipski changed the base branch from develop to refactor/config March 10, 2026 15:49
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 4 times, most recently from a21a9a9 to 5bede3f Compare March 10, 2026 17:39
@PawelLipski PawelLipski added the feature New feature or request label Mar 11, 2026
Base automatically changed from refactor/config to develop March 11, 2026 17:08
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch from 5bede3f to 380a0fc Compare March 11, 2026 17:18
@PawelLipski PawelLipski changed the base branch from develop to fix/go-int-stdout-tty March 12, 2026 11:08
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch from 380a0fc to f1d13f7 Compare March 12, 2026 11:08
Base automatically changed from fix/go-int-stdout-tty to develop March 12, 2026 12:12
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 5 times, most recently from a08c95e to b22b283 Compare March 12, 2026 14:47
@PawelLipski PawelLipski marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2026 15:44
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch from b22b283 to 80ed7aa Compare March 12, 2026 15:47
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch 2 times, most recently from c6a4911 to 3a26266 Compare March 12, 2026 16:27
@PawelLipski PawelLipski force-pushed the improve/go-interactive-status branch from 3a26266 to 044a126 Compare March 12, 2026 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants