Repository navigation
Add javascript_enabled option #304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1a19e39
Add java_script_enabled option
vakuum 70b2ebb
Rename java_script_enabled option to javascript_enabled
vakuum 31f241d
Disable JavaScript options when javascript_enabled is false
vakuum d1920bc
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into add-java-script-ena…
abrom File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the feature, but this does feel a little naive w.r.t the other options that explicitly require JS. Specifically:
I see four options:
OptionsFixer) and any of the above options are provided, but still let the failure happenOptionsFixer) and any of the above options are provided, but disable said options (probably just as extra guards in processor.cjs)My preference would be (in order) options 4, 2, 3, then 1.. but very much preferencing option 4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To demonstrate the behaviour:
This will time out, because even though we set
doneProcessing, it never gets called.. but Grover will still try wait for it to be there.And if you hard code the
wait_for_functionto just "true", it'll return.. so even with JS "disabled", the page will still actually be running JS.. sort of.If we were to take out the
wait_for_functionbit, you might expect that the page would come back only with the static content..but actually you get:
So it isn't enabled.. great.. but you can still execute script.. doh.
I know these are really Puppeteer issues, and or could be blamed on the end user for.. poor life (prop) choices 😆, but we know better.. and can do something about it 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In 31f241d the JavaScript options are now disabled when
javascript_enabledisfalse.