Skip to content

fix(geometry): use the real GeoModel sensitive volumes, and fail on unmatched patterns - #101

Open
matclim wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pr/geometry-config
Open

fix(geometry): use the real GeoModel sensitive volumes, and fail on unmatched patterns#101
matclim wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pr/geometry-config

Conversation

@matclim

@matclim matclim commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Physics Metrics Comparison

All configurations match reference (no significant differences)

  • Configurations compared: 1
  • Matching reference: 1

About this comparison

Physics metrics are extracted from ROOT files and compared.
Default comparison uses 5% tolerance for histogram statistics
and 3σ for fit parameters.

Metrics stored in git notes: refs/notes/ci/physics-metrics/<config>

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@matclim, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 112 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 783c51a6-853f-4402-a1fa-508844e36187

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6e7893 and d360980.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pixi.toml
  • src/detector_construction.hpp
  • workflows/lib.libsonnet

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@olantwin olantwin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be possible to do this more elegantly (also the initial matching), but fine for now.

Please drop the matplotlib change, I don't want it as dependency of aegir.

Comment thread pixi.toml

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please drop this change.

Comment thread workflows/lib.libsonnet
cpp: 'geometry_geomodel_provider',
db_file: 'ship_geometry.db',
sensitive_volumes: ['ScoringPlane'],
// Index in this list becomes SimHit::detectorId, so order matters and

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure this is the best way to do it. Ideally we would be using the enum from data-model

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants