Skip to content

Security: Rustix69/CollateralVaultManagementSystem

Security

docs/security.md

Security Analysis

Threat Model

Attack Surfaces

  1. Smart Contract Layer

    • Unauthorized fund withdrawal
    • Collateral manipulation
    • Authority bypass
    • Reentrancy attacks
    • Integer overflow/underflow
  2. Backend Service Layer

    • API abuse
    • Database injection
    • Transaction replay
    • DoS attacks
    • Unauthorized access
  3. Infrastructure Layer

    • RPC node compromise
    • Database breach
    • Network attacks
    • Key management

On-Chain Security Measures

1. PDA-Based Vault Ownership

Implementation:

#[account(
    seeds = [b"vault", user.key().as_ref()],
    bump = vault.bump,
)]
pub vault: Account<'info, CollateralVault>,

Security Benefits:

  • Non-custodial: Users retain control via their private key
  • Deterministic addresses: No address spoofing possible
  • Program-controlled: Only program can sign vault operations

Attack Mitigation:

  • Prevents unauthorized fund access
  • No private key storage needed
  • Eliminates custody risk

2. Authority Validation

Implementation:

require!(
    authority.is_authorized(&caller_program),
    VaultError::ProgramNotAuthorized
);

Security Benefits:

  • Whitelist-based access control
  • Admin-managed authorization
  • Granular permission system

Attack Mitigation:

  • Prevents unauthorized lock/unlock
  • Protects against malicious CPIs
  • Limits blast radius of compromised programs

3. Balance Validation

Implementation:

require!(
    vault.can_withdraw(amount),
    VaultError::InsufficientBalance
);

Security Benefits:

  • Pre-flight checks before operations
  • Prevents overdraft
  • Atomic state updates

Attack Mitigation:

  • Prevents double-spending
  • Protects against balance manipulation
  • Ensures consistency

4. Overflow Protection

Implementation:

self.total_balance = self.total_balance
    .checked_add(amount)
    .ok_or(error!(VaultError::Overflow))?;

Security Benefits:

  • Checked arithmetic on all operations
  • Explicit error handling
  • No silent failures

Attack Mitigation:

  • Prevents integer overflow attacks
  • Protects against underflow
  • Safe balance calculations

5. CPI Safety

Implementation:

token::transfer(
    CpiContext::new_with_signer(
        ctx.accounts.token_program.to_account_info(),
        Transfer {
            from: vault_token_account,
            to: user_token_account,
            authority: vault.to_account_info(),
        },
        signer_seeds,
    ),
    amount,
)?;

Security Benefits:

  • Explicit program invocation
  • PDA-based signing
  • No delegated authority

Attack Mitigation:

  • Prevents unauthorized token transfers
  • Secure cross-program calls
  • No approval attacks

Off-Chain Security Measures

1. Database Security

Measures:

  • Parameterized queries (SQL injection prevention)
  • Connection pooling with limits
  • Separate database users per service
  • Encrypted connections (TLS)
  • Regular backups

Implementation:

sqlx::query(
    "INSERT INTO vaults (user_pubkey, vault_pubkey, total_balance) VALUES ($1, $2, $3)"
)
.bind(user_pubkey.to_string())
.bind(vault_pubkey.to_string())
.bind(total_balance)
.execute(&self.pool)
.await?;

2. API Security

Measures:

  • Rate limiting (100 req/min)
  • Input validation
  • CORS configuration
  • Request size limits
  • Error message sanitization

Rate Limiting:

// TODO: Implement rate limiting middleware
// Example: tower-governor or custom middleware

3. Reconciliation System

Purpose: Detect discrepancies between on-chain and database state

Implementation:

pub async fn reconcile_vault(&self, vault_pubkey: &str) -> Result<()> {
    let on_chain_balance = self.fetch_on_chain_balance(vault_pubkey).await?;
    let db_balance = self.db.get_vault_balance(vault_pubkey).await?;
    
    if on_chain_balance != db_balance {
        self.db.log_reconciliation(
            vault_pubkey,
            db_balance,
            on_chain_balance,
            on_chain_balance - db_balance,
        ).await?;
        
        // Alert and update
        self.alert_discrepancy(vault_pubkey, on_chain_balance, db_balance);
    }
    
    Ok(())
}

Security Benefits:

  • Early detection of inconsistencies
  • Audit trail for investigations
  • Automated correction

4. Audit Logging

All operations logged:

  • Vault initialization
  • Deposits and withdrawals
  • Lock/unlock operations
  • Authority changes
  • Configuration updates

Log Format:

INSERT INTO audit_trail (action, vault_pubkey, user_pubkey, details, timestamp)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, NOW())

Advanced Security Features

1. Withdrawal Delay

Purpose: Time-lock mechanism to prevent instant theft

Implementation:

pub struct PendingWithdrawal {
    pub vault: Pubkey,
    pub amount: u64,
    pub requested_at: i64,
    pub executable_at: i64,  // requested_at + withdrawal_delay
    pub executed: bool,
}

Security Benefits:

  • Grace period for fraud detection
  • User notification window
  • Emergency intervention time

Configuration:

// Set 1 hour delay
initialize_security_config(
    withdrawal_delay: 3600,  // seconds
    daily_limit: 1_000_000_000,
)

2. Withdrawal Whitelist

Purpose: Restrict withdrawals to approved addresses

Implementation:

require!(
    config.is_whitelisted(&destination),
    VaultError::NotWhitelisted
);

Security Benefits:

  • Limits attack destination
  • Reduces theft impact
  • User-controlled security

3. Daily Withdrawal Limits

Purpose: Cap maximum daily withdrawal amount

Implementation:

pub fn check_daily_limit(&mut self, amount: u64, timestamp: i64) -> Result<()> {
    let current_day = timestamp / 86400;
    
    if current_day > self.last_withdrawal_day {
        self.withdrawn_today = 0;
        self.last_withdrawal_day = current_day;
    }
    
    require!(
        self.withdrawn_today + amount <= self.daily_withdrawal_limit,
        VaultError::DailyLimitExceeded
    );
    
    self.withdrawn_today += amount;
    Ok(())
}

Security Benefits:

  • Limits damage from compromised keys
  • Rate-limiting for withdrawals
  • Configurable per vault

4. Multi-Signature Vaults

Purpose: Require M-of-N signatures for withdrawals

Implementation:

pub struct MultiSigVault {
    pub vault: Pubkey,
    pub threshold: u8,        // M signatures required
    pub signers: Vec<Pubkey>, // N total signers
}

pub struct WithdrawalProposal {
    pub multi_sig_vault: Pubkey,
    pub amount: u64,
    pub approvals: Vec<Pubkey>,
    pub expires_at: i64,
}

Workflow:

  1. Signer creates proposal
  2. Other signers approve
  3. Execute when threshold met
  4. Proposal expires if not executed

Security Benefits:

  • Shared custody model
  • Protection against single key compromise
  • Organizational controls

5. Emergency Pause

Purpose: Admin can halt operations during security incident

Implementation:

require!(!config.paused, VaultError::VaultPaused);

Trigger Conditions:

  • Detected exploit
  • Unusual activity patterns
  • Scheduled maintenance

Key Management

Private Keys

Backend Wallet:

  • Stored in encrypted file
  • Environment variable path
  • Limited permissions (400)
  • Separate keys per environment

Best Practices:

# Generate key
solana-keygen new --outfile ~/.config/solana/backend.json

# Set permissions
chmod 400 ~/.config/solana/backend.json

# Use in environment
export WALLET_PATH=~/.config/solana/backend.json

Program Upgrade Authority

Recommendations:

  • Multi-sig upgrade authority
  • Separate from operational keys
  • Hardware wallet storage
  • Time-locked upgrades

Monitoring & Alerting

Real-Time Monitoring

Metrics:

  • Unusual withdrawal patterns
  • Large balance changes
  • Failed transaction spikes
  • Authorization attempts
  • Reconciliation discrepancies

Alert Triggers:

// Example alert conditions
if withdrawal_amount > LARGE_WITHDRAWAL_THRESHOLD {
    alert("Large withdrawal detected", vault_pubkey, amount);
}

if failed_withdrawals > MAX_FAILED_ATTEMPTS {
    alert("Multiple failed withdrawals", vault_pubkey, count);
}

if discrepancy > DISCREPANCY_THRESHOLD {
    alert("Balance discrepancy", vault_pubkey, discrepancy);
}

Audit Log Analysis

Regular Reviews:

  • Daily transaction summaries
  • Weekly security audits
  • Monthly pattern analysis
  • Quarterly security assessments

Incident Response

Response Plan

  1. Detection: Automated monitoring triggers alert
  2. Assessment: Evaluate severity and impact
  3. Containment: Emergency pause if needed
  4. Eradication: Fix vulnerability
  5. Recovery: Resume operations
  6. Post-Mortem: Document and improve

Emergency Contacts

  • On-call engineer: [Contact info]
  • Security team: [Contact info]
  • Management escalation: [Contact info]

Security Audits

Recommended Audits

  1. Smart Contract Audit

    • Firms: Trail of Bits, OtterSec, Neodyme
    • Focus: Anchor program, CPI safety, authority checks
  2. Backend Security Review

    • API security
    • Database security
    • Infrastructure hardening
  3. Penetration Testing

    • API endpoints
    • WebSocket connections
    • Rate limiting effectiveness

Best Practices

Development

  • Use latest Anchor version
  • Enable all compiler warnings
  • Comprehensive test coverage (>80%)
  • Code review for all changes
  • Static analysis tools
  • Fuzzing for critical functions

Deployment

  • Separate environments (dev/staging/prod)
  • Gradual rollouts
  • Monitoring before full launch
  • Rollback procedures
  • Incident response plan
  • Regular backups

Operations

  • Principle of least privilege
  • Key rotation schedule
  • Regular security updates
  • Vulnerability scanning
  • Log retention policy
  • Disaster recovery plan

Known Limitations

  1. RPC Dependency: Backend relies on Solana RPC nodes

    • Mitigation: Multiple RPC endpoints, fallback logic
  2. Database Single Point of Failure: PostgreSQL

    • Mitigation: Replication, regular backups
  3. No Built-in 2FA: API lacks two-factor authentication

    • Mitigation: Add in production deployment
  4. Limited Rate Limiting: Basic implementation

    • Mitigation: Enhance with sophisticated rate limiting

Compliance Considerations

Data Protection

  • User data encrypted at rest
  • TLS for data in transit
  • GDPR compliance for EU users
  • Data retention policies

Financial Regulations

  • KYC/AML integration points
  • Transaction reporting
  • Audit trail requirements
  • Regulatory reporting APIs

Security Checklist

Pre-Deployment:

  • Smart contract audited
  • All tests passing
  • Security config enabled
  • Monitoring configured
  • Incident response plan ready
  • Key management documented
  • Backup procedures tested
  • Rate limiting configured

Post-Deployment:

  • Monitor logs daily
  • Review alerts
  • Test emergency procedures
  • Update documentation
  • Schedule security reviews
  • Track vulnerabilities
  • Plan upgrades

Conclusion

The Collateral Vault system implements defense-in-depth security with multiple layers:

  • On-chain validation and authorization
  • Off-chain monitoring and reconciliation
  • Advanced features for enhanced protection
  • Comprehensive logging and auditing

Regular security reviews, updates, and monitoring are essential for maintaining system security.

There aren’t any published security advisories