fix: guard WinHttp URL port parsing exceptions

[H-Chris233]

Problem

WinHttp::ParseUrl calls std::stoi on the port substring extracted from URLs like host:port. If the port field is empty, non-numeric, or out of range, std::stoi throws std::invalid_argument or std::out_of_range, crashing the caller.

Changes

• Wrapped std::stoi call in a try-catch block.
• Added explicit port range validation: only values in [1, 65535] are accepted.
• Added full-string consumption check via std::stol's pos parameter to reject partially-numeric port strings (e.g., host:12312abc).
• On parse failure, returns an invalid ParsedUrl, which callers already handle as a "skip this URL" signal.

Testing

• Tested with malformed URLs: host:, host:abc, host:999999, host:12312abc, and valid URLs to confirm no regression.

[JanitorialMess]

std::stol has the same partial-parse behavior as std::stoi: host:12312abc is accepted as port 12312, so malformed ports with a numeric prefix still pass.
If the goal is to reject malformed ports, the parser needs to verify that the entire port substring was consumed.

Also, the PR description says invalid ports leave the port at default 0, but ParseUrl initializes the port to 80 / 443 before parsing, and on port parse failure it returns before setting valid. So the behavior is "return invalid ParsedUrl", not "port defaults to 0" unless I missed something.

[H-Chris233]

Good catches, thanks for the review.

1. Partial parse: Fixed by using std::stol's pos parameter — now verifies the entire port substring was consumed. Strings like "12312abc" are rejected correctly.

2. PR description: Updated — the description now says "returns an invalid ParsedUrl" instead of "port defaults to 0".

[OpenSteam001]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".