Skip to content

fix: default missing evaluation type in evaluatePlp#667

Merged
egillax merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix-636-evaluation-type
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

fix: default missing evaluation type in evaluatePlp#667
egillax merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix-636-evaluation-type

Conversation

@egillax

@egillax egillax commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • add a default All evaluation stratum when evaluatePlp() receives predictions without the requested type column
  • cover standalone prediction evaluation with a regression test

Fixes #636

Testing

  • Rscript -e 'devtools::test(filter = "evaluation")'

@egillax egillax merged commit aee14bf into develop Jun 17, 2026
8 checks passed
@egillax egillax deleted the fix-636-evaluation-type branch June 17, 2026 09:51
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.73%. Comparing base (ea9ba61) to head (918ebac).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #667   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    89.73%   89.73%           
========================================
  Files           49       49           
  Lines        13689    13691    +2     
========================================
+ Hits         12284    12286    +2     
  Misses        1405     1405           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant