Skip to content

fix: issue templates referenced non-existent labels#609

Merged
rdmueller merged 1 commit into
LLM-Coding:mainfrom
raifdmueller:fix/issue-template-labels
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

fix: issue templates referenced non-existent labels#609
rdmueller merged 1 commit into
LLM-Coding:mainfrom
raifdmueller:fix/issue-template-labels

Conversation

@raifdmueller

@raifdmueller raifdmueller commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Three issue templates referenced labels the repository does not define, so issues created from them silently arrived unlabeled (discovered while filing #608gh fails loudly, the web flow drops them silently):

Template Was Now
propose-anchor.yml new-anchor, needs-validation enhancement
contract-proposal.yml new-contract, needs-validation enhancement
process-proposal.yml process, discussion question

Alternative considered: creating the five missing labels instead — that would allow finer proposal filtering. Went with the minimal fix to existing labels; happy to switch if dedicated proposal labels are preferred.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

Releases-Hinweise

  • Chores
    • Issue-Template-Beschriftungen aktualisiert: Die Klassifizierungsetiketten für Vertrags-, Prozess- und Anchor-Vorschläge wurden überarbeitet und vereinheitlicht, um einen verbesserten Workflow bei der Problemverwaltung zu ermöglichen.

propose-anchor ("new-anchor", "needs-validation"), contract-proposal
("new-contract", "needs-validation") and process-proposal ("process",
"discussion") referenced labels the repository does not define, so
issues created from these templates silently arrived unlabeled. All
three now use existing labels (enhancement / question).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 540878fd-c35c-4b61-98e2-4941a511f739

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01e15d1 and 72564c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/contract-proposal.yml
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/process-proposal.yml
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/propose-anchor.yml

Walkthrough

Diese PR aktualisiert die Label-Kategorisierungen in drei GitHub Issue Template-Dateien. Contract-Proposal und Propose-Anchor ersetzen new-contract und needs-validation durch enhancement. Process-Proposal wechselt von process und discussion zu question. Alle anderen Template-Inhalte bleiben unverändert.

Changes

Issue Template Label-Kategorisierung

Layer / Datei(en) Zusammenfassung
Label-Updates in Issue-Templates
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/contract-proposal.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/process-proposal.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/propose-anchor.yml
Die Label-Metadaten werden aktualisiert: Contract-Proposal und Propose-Anchor verwenden jetzt enhancement statt new-contract/needs-validation. Process-Proposal wechselt zu question statt process/discussion.

Geschätzter Code-Review-Aufwand

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 Minuten

Möglicherweise verwandte Pull Requests

  • LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors#570: Führt GitHub Issue Template-Dateien mit initialen Label-Konventionen ein. Diese PR aktualisiert die Label-Sätze in denselben Templates für eine vereinheitlichte Kategorisierung.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed Der Titel beschreibt präzise die Hauptänderung: Behebung von Verweisen auf nicht existierende Labels in Issue-Templates.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rdmueller rdmueller merged commit b65910b into LLM-Coding:main Jun 12, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants