Full simulation with Genie - #2083
Conversation
|
/run-validation
|
|
The validation workflow is running here: https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/actions/runs/27733274965. |
Validation ResultsSome validation samples failed! ❌
|
Validation ResultsSome validation samples failed! ❌
|
Validation ResultsSome validation samples failed! ❌
|
tomeichlersmith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Honestly, this looks great. My only requests are a few technical things.
|
While I work on Tom's suggestion, here is the KS test summary (with my own importance filter so the file doesnt get bigger than the gihub max for uploads) One change is that Genie was considering everybody to be primary, now that's not the case anymore. And then ofc we now fill the tagger plots, the target volume is bigger, etc. Seems like the electron is softer than earlier, but that might just be statistics? The electron is more fiducial in the ECAL. Figure 140: less zero track events makes me happier Figure 159: this confuses me tho... @tomeichlersmith any input on this? |
|
Now that we aren't producing the GENIE event inside the target, we are susceptible to upstream objects softening the electron and causing it to curve further towards negative x in the magnetic field. I'm surprised if that affect causes the full shift of the distribution, so I'm guessing that our settings for the beam are a little off. I originally got the settings for the electron by shooting a positron backwards from the target after removing the upstream detector components. #1396 but there have been many changes since then so we may need to update those settings? |
Yeah prob we should check again. I see the config to run, but then how do you extract the final number? Can you maybe put the analysis code too? I also wonder if we should make that into a unit test? |
|
The analysis I used way back then is included in the tar-ball I uploaded, I'm trying it out now. |
|
OK I think the beam smear actually makes sense, you do the beamspot from around the origin as coming from the primary. But this study was great to show that v15 didnt change much, thanks Tom! |
|
/run-validation |
|
The validation workflow is running here: https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/actions/runs/27799575659. |
Validation ResultsSome validation samples failed! ❌
|


I am updating ldmx-sw, here are the details.
A big change where Genie is under GEANT and similarly to the signal we lead the 8 GeV primary generator thru the upstream material, and then hand the electron at the correct energy at the target volume to Genie. With this these particles are now secondaries and can be one-to-one compared to the GEANT based EN processes.
What are the issues that this addresses?
Resolves #2059
Check List
Source is not at 0,0,0 anymore:
Mult:

Tagger DQM is filled now:

Implementation is such that the old way of doing it is still possible