Skip to content

Bump @fairmint/canton-node-sdk to 0.0.259 - #10

Merged
HardlyDifficult merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/bump-canton-node-sdk-0.0.259-3a96
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

Bump @fairmint/canton-node-sdk to 0.0.259#10
HardlyDifficult merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/bump-canton-node-sdk-0.0.259-3a96

Conversation

@HardlyDifficult

@HardlyDifficult HardlyDifficult commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Bumps @fairmint/canton-node-sdk devDependency 0.0.2530.0.259. Peer range >=0.0.232 <0.1.0 unchanged.

Inherits unified 60s read retries from canton-node-sdk #409 (token 5xx + semantic reads). Writes still do not auto-retry.


Note

Low Risk
Dependency-only bump with no application source changes; main caveat is behavior inherited from canton-node-sdk 0.0.259 (e.g. read retry semantics) affecting dev/integration tests, not library API surface in this repo.

Overview
Bumps the @fairmint/canton-node-sdk devDependency from 0.0.253 to 0.0.259 in package.json and refreshes package-lock.json. The published peerDependencies range (>=0.0.232 <0.1.0) is unchanged.

The lockfile also picks up transitive updates from that SDK line, notably @canton-network/wallet-sdk 1.3.11.4.0 and a coordinated bump of @canton-network/core-* packages to 1.10.1 / 1.18.1, plus minor bumps to axios, ws, jose, dayjs, and uuid. Some gRPC/protobuf-related packages drop from the tree as wallet-sdk 1.4.0 no longer pulls them in.

Consumers of this repo at runtime still supply their own @fairmint/canton-node-sdk within the peer range; this PR only pins what dev/tests use locally.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 43a8113. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Inherits unified 60s read retries from canton-node-sdk #409 (token 5xx + semantic reads). Writes still do not auto-retry.
@HardlyDifficult
HardlyDifficult merged commit ba81e15 into main Aug 18, 2026
3 checks passed
@HardlyDifficult
HardlyDifficult deleted the cursor/bump-canton-node-sdk-0.0.259-3a96 branch August 18, 2026 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants