-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 811
Add missing OCIL to PCI-DSS rules #14783
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -104,3 +104,17 @@ references: | |
| nist: CM-6(a),AU-8(1)(a),AU-8(2),AU-12(1) | ||
| nist-csf: PR.PT-1 | ||
| pcidss: Req-10.4.3 | ||
|
|
||
| ocil_clause: 'no additional NTP servers are specified' | ||
|
|
||
| ocil: |- | ||
| To verify that additional NTP servers are configured for time synchronization, | ||
| open the following file: | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li><pre>{{{ chrony_conf_path }}}</pre> in the case the system in question is | ||
| configured to use the <tt>chronyd</tt> as the NTP daemon (default setting)</li> | ||
| <li><pre>/etc/ntp.conf</pre> in the case the system in question is configured | ||
| to use the <tt>ntpd</tt> as the NTP daemon</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
| In the file, there should be multiple lines similar to the following: | ||
| <pre>server <i>ntpserver</i></pre> | ||
|
Comment on lines
+119
to
+120
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks — I looked at the rule's OVAL before deciding. The check ( |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The returned
auditctl -llines include the permission flags inline (e.g.-w /var/run/utmp -p wa -k session), and the OCIL already directs the reviewer to confirm-p wais present for each file, so the procedure does verify both the watched paths and thewapermissions. I kept the phrasing consistent with the established sibling ruleaudit_rules_usergroup_modification, whose OCIL uses the sameauditctl -l | grep -E ...approach with an explicitperm=waconfirmation note.