Move to production - #3
Conversation
- Created GITHUB_WORKFLOWS_ARCHITECTURE.md to outline the developer workflow, event triggers, status check flow, Docker image pipeline, release pipeline, deployment pipeline, scheduled testing pipeline, branch strategy, and team organization structure. - Ensured clarity on automated testing, code quality, reproducible deployments, and team responsibilities. chore: Add commitlint configuration - Introduced commitlint.config.js to enforce conventional commit message standards. - Configured rules for commit message types, subject casing, and body formatting. chore: Create GitHub setup scripts for organization setup - Added github-setup.bat for Windows users to guide through GitHub organization setup. - Added github-setup.ps1 for PowerShell users to assist in the same setup process. - Added github-setup.sh for Unix-based systems to facilitate organization setup.
…on steps, and enhance error handling
chore: remove outdated release checklist file
- Implement unit tests for shipment creation, listing, retrieval, and status updates in `logistics.shipments.controller.test.js`. - Add tests for CRUD operations on routes, vehicles, drivers, tracking events, and cold chain logs in `logistics.workspace.controller.test.js`. - Introduce OpenAPI contract tests to ensure endpoint coverage and schema validation in `openapi.logistics-workspace.contract.test.js`. - Validate status transitions and UI status mappings for various logistics entities.
- Implement tests for CRUD operations and status transitions in finance workspace controller, covering invoices, credits, and insurance policies. - Create OpenAPI contract tests to ensure all relevant endpoints and schemas are documented correctly. - Develop tests for payments workspace controller, including wallet operations, transaction filtering, escrow lifecycle, and payout workflows. - Mock necessary models and services to isolate tests and ensure deterministic behavior.
- Implemented GET /profiles to list user profiles with pagination and filtering options. - Added POST /profiles/:profileId/forecast/refresh to refresh forecast data for a specific profile. - Introduced GET /profiles/:profileId/forecast/history to retrieve forecast history for a profile. - Enhanced validation for profile-related endpoints. feat(weather): extend alert and rule management functionality - Added POST /rules/:id/test to test weather rules with provided readings. - Introduced new enums for alert UI status and rule lifecycle status. - Updated weather alert model to include resolution metadata (resolvedAt, resolvedBy, resolutionReason). - Enhanced weather alert service to handle UI status transitions and resolution logic. - Updated weather rule model to support workflow state management. fix(weather): improve validation and error handling - Enhanced validation for alert and rule status transitions. - Updated alert listing to support filtering by UI status. - Improved test coverage for weather workspace controller, ensuring proper handling of alerts and rules. test(weather): add comprehensive tests for new endpoints and features - Created tests for profile management, forecast refresh, and history retrieval. - Added tests for alert acknowledgment, dismissal, and escalation, ensuring correct UI status updates. - Implemented tests for rule creation, updating, and testing, validating status transitions and expected behaviors.
…, and controller tests - Implemented Recommendation and Price Estimation models with appropriate schemas and validations. - Created Price Prediction and Price Validator models to handle price-related data and validation logic. - Developed comprehensive tests for prices workspace controller, ensuring CRUD operations and workflow transitions are validated. - Added OpenAPI contract tests to verify endpoint coverage and schema alignment. - Enhanced market intelligence features with insights, trends, alerts, recommendations, and data sources, including their respective tests.
…mas and indexes test: implement comprehensive tests for expert workspace controller including field case and research report workflows test: add OpenAPI contract tests for expert workspace endpoints and schemas
…ts, and reports - Introduced status fields for IChartDocument and IDashboardDocument to manage lifecycle states (draft, published, archived). - Updated validation logic to include status checks for charts and dashboards. - Created new models for AnalyticsDataset and AnalyticsReport with appropriate status management. - Implemented CRUD operations and status workflows for datasets, charts, dashboards, and reports in the controller. - Added comprehensive tests for all new functionalities, ensuring proper status transitions and validations. - Enhanced OpenAPI documentation to reflect new status enums and endpoint behaviors.
…d permissions management - Implemented admin workspace routes for organizations, roles, and permissions. - Added validation logic for creating, updating, and listing roles and permissions. - Created comprehensive unit tests for the admin workspace controller, covering CRUD operations and status transitions. - Developed OpenAPI contract tests to ensure endpoint coverage and schema validation for admin workspace functionalities.
…erties refactor(expert): enhance uiStatus handling with optional number conversion refactor(finance): improve type safety in toPlainObject function refactor(logistics): update toPlainObject for better type handling refactor(logisticsWorkspace): refine toPlainObject and uiStatus handling refactor(marketIntelligence): enhance toPlainObject and add toObjectId utility refactor(organization): improve toPlainObject type handling refactor(payment): enhance toPlainObject for better type safety refactor(price): improve type handling in price controller methods refactor(weather): update toPlainObject for better type safety feat(types): extend Express Request interface with additional user properties
… to include platform_admin role
… and security alert emails
…ved styling for better user engagement
|
❌ Build Status: FAILURE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR appears to introduce GitHub organization/repo setup automation and CI/CD workflow scaffolding (Actions, CODEOWNERS, commit linting), while removing a large set of prior “V1/IAM/E‑market” planning and reference documents.
Changes:
- Added GitHub Actions workflows for CI, code-quality, releases, deploy, scheduled tests, PR checks, and commit linting.
- Added organization/repo setup scripts (bash/PowerShell/batch), commitlint configuration, CODEOWNERS, and several GitHub workflow docs.
- Removed multiple older product/implementation/reference markdown documents (V1 plans, IAM guides, API references, etc.).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 50 out of 167 changed files in this pull request and generated 16 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| github-setup.sh | Adds a bash helper to print org setup instructions/checklists and validate gh/git availability. |
| github-setup.ps1 | Adds a PowerShell helper with similar org setup instructions/checklists and prereq checks. |
| github-setup.bat | Adds a Windows batch helper to validate tools and print setup instructions. |
| commitlint.config.js | Introduces commitlint rules (Conventional Commits) and interactive prompt configuration. |
| V1_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md | Removes a legacy V1 implementation plan document. |
| V1_GAP_REPORT.md | Removes a legacy V1 gap report document. |
| V1 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.md | Removes a duplicate/variant V1 implementation plan document. |
| RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md | Removes a legacy release checklist document. |
| RELEASE CHECKLIST.md | Removes a duplicate/variant release checklist document. |
| PROJECT_SUMMARY.md | Removes a legacy project overview/summary document. |
| PEST_DISEASE_QUICK_REFERENCE.md | Removes a legacy pest/disease quick reference document. |
| IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md | Removes a legacy implementation summary document. |
| IAM_SYSTEM_DOCUMENTATION.md | Removes a legacy IAM system documentation document. |
| IAM_QUICK_START.md | Removes a legacy IAM quick start document. |
| IAM_QUICK_REFERENCE.md | Removes a legacy IAM quick reference document. |
| IAM_INSTALLATION_GUIDE.md | Removes a legacy IAM installation guide document. |
| IAM_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md | Removes a legacy IAM implementation summary document. |
| IAM_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md | Removes a legacy IAM complete guide document. |
| FILE_STRUCTURE.md | Removes a legacy file structure document. |
| E_MARKET_API_REFERENCE.md | Removes a legacy e-market API quick reference document. |
| ERRORS_AND_FIXES.md | Removes a legacy “errors and fixes” document. |
| CLYCITES CONCEPT GAP REPORT.md | Removes a legacy concept gap report document. |
| CHANGELOG.md | Expands the changelog content substantially (new “workspace APIs/uiStatus/transition rules” notes). |
| API_TESTING.md | Removes a legacy API testing collection document. |
| API_DOCUMENTATION.md | Removes a legacy API documentation document. |
| GITHUB_WORKFLOWS_ARCHITECTURE.md | Adds an architecture overview doc describing intended workflow execution and branch strategy. |
| GITHUB_WORKFLOWS.md | Adds documentation for the GitHub Actions workflows and repo/org configuration. |
| GITHUB_SETUP_SUMMARY.md | Adds a summary of what was created for GitHub workflows/setup and next steps. |
| GITHUB_QUICK_REFERENCE.md | Adds a developer quick reference for branches, commits, PR flow, and local dev commands. |
| GITHUB_ORGANIZATION_SETUP.md | Adds an org/repo setup guide (secrets/variables/branch protection/teams/CODEOWNERS). |
| .github/workflows/schedule-tests.yml | Adds scheduled (and push-triggered) test workflow including Codecov + Slack notification. |
| .github/workflows/release.yml | Adds tag-triggered GitHub Release creation with generated changelog. |
| .github/workflows/pull-request.yml | Adds PR validation (title/branch naming/lint/tests) + Codecov upload + PR comment. |
| .github/workflows/lint-commit.yml | Adds commit message linting workflow. |
| .github/workflows/deploy.yml | Adds a deploy workflow with optional AWS role assumption and Slack notifications. |
| .github/workflows/code-quality.yml | Adds SonarCloud scan, npm audit, and TypeScript type-check workflows. |
| .github/workflows/ci.yml | Adds a CI workflow for lint/test + Codecov upload + npm audit. |
| .github/workflows/build-and-push.yml | Adds an artifact build workflow (uploads dist/package.json/README). |
| .github/README.md | Adds documentation for the .github/ directory and how to run setup scripts. |
| .github/CODEOWNERS | Adds CODEOWNERS rules for teams by path. |
| .github/.gitignore | Adds a .gitignore within .github/ with patterns for artifacts/logs/env/deps. |
Files not reviewed (1)
- express-app/package-lock.json: Language not supported
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.
| environment: | ||
| name: ${{ github.event.inputs.environment || 'staging' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On push events there is no github.event.inputs.environment, so this workflow will always target staging even when pushing to master. Derive the environment from github.ref_name for push-triggered runs (e.g., master → production, staging → staging) and only use the input for workflow_dispatch.
| if: ${{ steps.config.outputs.configured == 'true' }} | ||
| env: | ||
| AWS_REGION: ${{ vars.AWS_REGION }} | ||
| ENVIRONMENT: ${{ github.event.inputs.environment || 'staging' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On push events there is no github.event.inputs.environment, so this workflow will always target staging even when pushing to master. Derive the environment from github.ref_name for push-triggered runs (e.g., master → production, staging → staging) and only use the input for workflow_dispatch.
| - name: Upload coverage reports | ||
| if: ${{ hashFiles('coverage/coverage-final.json') != '' }} | ||
| uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5 | ||
| with: | ||
| files: ./coverage/coverage-final.json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This uploads coverage/coverage-final.json, but the workflow only runs npm test (no explicit --coverage). Unless coverage is enabled by default in the test script, the file won’t exist and coverage won’t be published. Make the test step generate coverage explicitly (e.g., run the test command with coverage or use a dedicated coverage script) and align the uploaded file path with the actual output.
| - name: Generate coverage report | ||
| run: npm test | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Upload coverage to Codecov | ||
| if: ${{ hashFiles('coverage/coverage-final.json') != '' }} | ||
| uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code-coverage job runs npm test but doesn’t explicitly generate coverage, yet it tries to upload coverage/coverage-final.json. Update this job to run tests with coverage output (or call the project’s coverage script) so the upload condition/file is meaningful.
| types: [ opened, synchronize, reopened, edited ] | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| pr-validation: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both pr-validation and code-coverage jobs perform a full checkout + npm ci + npm test, which doubles CI time for each PR. Consider merging coverage generation into pr-validation (single job), or make code-coverage depend on pr-validation and reuse artifacts/cache outputs to avoid re-running tests.
| .github/ | ||
| !.github/workflows/ | ||
| !.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ | ||
| !.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | ||
| !.github/CODEOWNERS | ||
| !.github/dependabot.yml | ||
| !.github/renovate.json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This .gitignore lives inside .github/, so the pattern .github/ is relative to that directory and effectively targets .github/.github/, which is almost certainly not intended. If the intent is to ignore root-level .github/, this file should likely be at repo root (or the pattern should be adjusted to match paths relative to .github/).
| .github/ | |
| !.github/workflows/ | |
| !.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ | |
| !.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | |
| !.github/CODEOWNERS | |
| !.github/dependabot.yml | |
| !.github/renovate.json | |
| * | |
| !/.gitignore | |
| !/workflows/ | |
| !/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ | |
| !/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | |
| !/CODEOWNERS | |
| !/dependabot.yml | |
| !/renovate.json |
| **Trigger:** Push to `main`/`develop`, Pull Requests | ||
|
|
||
| **Jobs:** | ||
| - **lint-and-test** (Node 18.x, 20.x matrix) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This documentation doesn’t match the added workflows: the YAML files use staging/master branches and Node.js 22 (not a Node 18/20 matrix). Update the docs to reflect the actual configured triggers and Node versions to avoid incorrect setup/expectations.
| **Trigger:** Push to `main`/`develop`, Pull Requests | |
| **Jobs:** | |
| - **lint-and-test** (Node 18.x, 20.x matrix) | |
| **Trigger:** Push to `staging`/`master`, Pull Requests | |
| **Jobs:** | |
| - **lint-and-test** (Node 22.x) |
| /src/services/auth/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
| /src/common/middleware/auth* @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Farmers Module | ||
| /src/services/farmers/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Marketplace Module | ||
| /src/services/marketplace/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Products/Catalog Module | ||
| /src/services/products/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Orders Module | ||
| /src/services/orders/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Notifications Service | ||
| /src/services/notifications/ @clycites-org/platform-core | ||
|
|
||
| # Analytics Service | ||
| /src/services/analytics/ @clycites-org/platform-core |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The CODEOWNERS rules target /src/services/... paths, but the repository’s module layout may be under /src/modules/... (based on other project docs/history). If these paths don’t exist, CODEOWNERS won’t apply and required reviews won’t be enforced. Update CODEOWNERS entries to match the actual directory structure used in the repo.
| /src/services/auth/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| /src/common/middleware/auth* @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Farmers Module | |
| /src/services/farmers/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Marketplace Module | |
| /src/services/marketplace/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Products/Catalog Module | |
| /src/services/products/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Orders Module | |
| /src/services/orders/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Notifications Service | |
| /src/services/notifications/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Analytics Service | |
| /src/services/analytics/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| /src/modules/auth/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| /src/common/middleware/auth* @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Farmers Module | |
| /src/modules/farmers/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Marketplace Module | |
| /src/modules/marketplace/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Products/Catalog Module | |
| /src/modules/products/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Orders Module | |
| /src/modules/orders/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Notifications Service | |
| /src/modules/notifications/ @clycites-org/platform-core | |
| # Analytics Service | |
| /src/modules/analytics/ @clycites-org/platform-core |
| - name: Comment PR with build status | ||
| if: always() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will create a new PR comment on every workflow run (including re-runs and pushes), which can spam PR discussions. Consider updating an existing comment (search by a marker) or posting status to the job summary / a single 'sticky' comment instead.
| const comment = `${statusEmoji} **Build Status:** ${buildStatus.toUpperCase()}`; | ||
|
|
||
| github.rest.issues.createComment({ | ||
| issue_number: context.issue.number, | ||
| owner: context.repo.owner, | ||
| repo: context.repo.repo, | ||
| body: comment | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will create a new PR comment on every workflow run (including re-runs and pushes), which can spam PR discussions. Consider updating an existing comment (search by a marker) or posting status to the job summary / a single 'sticky' comment instead.
| const comment = `${statusEmoji} **Build Status:** ${buildStatus.toUpperCase()}`; | |
| github.rest.issues.createComment({ | |
| issue_number: context.issue.number, | |
| owner: context.repo.owner, | |
| repo: context.repo.repo, | |
| body: comment | |
| }); | |
| const marker = '<!-- build-status-comment -->'; | |
| const commentBody = `${marker} | |
| ${statusEmoji} **Build Status:** ${buildStatus.toUpperCase()}`; | |
| const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({ | |
| issue_number: context.issue.number, | |
| owner: context.repo.owner, | |
| repo: context.repo.repo, | |
| per_page: 100 | |
| }); | |
| const existingComment = comments.find(c => typeof c.body === 'string' && c.body.startsWith(marker)); | |
| if (existingComment) { | |
| await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ | |
| comment_id: existingComment.id, | |
| owner: context.repo.owner, | |
| repo: context.repo.repo, | |
| body: commentBody | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| await github.rest.issues.createComment({ | |
| issue_number: context.issue.number, | |
| owner: context.repo.owner, | |
| repo: context.repo.repo, | |
| body: commentBody | |
| }); | |
| } |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)