Fixed impossible-to-one-shot instructions for twelve-days JS problem#10
Open
Mike-Dax wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fixed impossible-to-one-shot instructions for twelve-days JS problem#10Mike-Dax wants to merge 1 commit into
Mike-Dax wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would 'fix' this upstream, but the repo doesn't take contributions.
A human in a learning context would read the tests, then realise the need for the extra arguments, but from the information in the instructions and the scaffold alone, this is impossible to one-shot. Every model I've tried has simply injected the 'answer' string in, then it fails the tests, then most of the time they can get it on the second pass.
I don't think whether it's 0 or 1 indexed, or whether there's a trailing newline is really a good 'software engineering' test. I think having a trailing newline and it being 1 indexed is weird and if the models get that correct first go, it's probably data contamination. Lets remove those ambiguities.