update_demo_notebook

[mahaalbashir]

Improve the choice of tables produced in the demo notebook

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.75%. Comparing base (7f3e984) to head (7851ce3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #392   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.75%   99.75%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1602     1602           
=======================================
  Hits         1598     1598           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jim-smith]

@mahaalbashir I'm wondering whether we should start by producing the pd.crosstab version of the first table, and then saying:

if you submit just yes, you're going to get an email from the output checkers asking you to produce the table of counts, so that they can check minimum thresholds, and maybe some other data to help them check from 'dominance' if it is financial data. 

For example, did you spot  that cell on the right with mean 1?  How many families are being aggregated to get that  suspiciously integer value?


All this to-and-fro  adds effort and delays to the process.

Acro is designed to help you with this! 
Because you asked for a mean' statistic it knows about the possible risks and so checks them for you (and the output checkers).

Then shows the acro version....

[jim-smith]

see comment in conversation please.

should we use a different aggregation function for the second table?