Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: ZeroIntensity

peps/pep-0842.rst

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 25-Jul-2026
 Python-Version: 3.16
-Post-History: `24-Jul-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/108266/9>`__
+Post-History: `24-Jul-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/108266>`__
 
 
 Abstract
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ simply access ``mod.__dict__['attr_name']`` instead of ``mod.attr_name`` at
 runtime.
 
 This is by design. Python does not include access modifiers as a language
-feature for a reason. To `quote <https://discuss.python.org/t/104994/2>`_ Eric Smith:
+feature for a reason. To `quote <https://discuss.python.org/t/104994/2>`__ Eric Smith:
 "Access to internals of other classes is a feature when you need it". This PEP
 does not intend to change this convention, nor should it be interpreted as an
 indication that Python is tending toward the direction of true access modifiers.
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ Reference Implementation
 ========================
 
 A reference implementation of this PEP can be found
-`here <https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/main...ZeroIntensity:cpython:experiments/module-exports>`_.
+`here <https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/main...ZeroIntensity:cpython:experiments/module-exports>`__.
 
 
 Rejected Ideas
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ Add new ``export`` syntax
 -------------------------
 
 Rather than simply defining exported names in a global variable, it was
-`suggested <https://discuss.python.org/t/108266/11>`_ to take this proposal a
+`suggested <https://discuss.python.org/t/108266/11>`__ to take this proposal a
 step further and add a true ``export`` (soft) keyword to Python that would
 effectively auto-generate an ``__export__`` variable at runtime, like so:
 
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ Acknowledgements
 ================
 
 Thanks to Hugo van Kemenade and Savannah Ostrowski for `inspiring
-<https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/154639#discussion_r3647508463>`_ the idea
+<https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/154639#discussion_r3647508463>`__ the idea
 behind this PEP.