What is the AI stance of the project?

[nushea]

I know that the project has displayed in the past a very pro-human stance in its readme, namely the Vibecoders begone section.

However looking at the project now I see that it has since been removed with 72d7f72

Not long after a vibecoded PR has been admitted into the project, as self described by the author as having no good prior knowledge of shell #1863 (comment)

Alongside it i see that the project was considering introducing vibe reviews with #1861 and that one contributor has recommended the vibecoding of a PR for an issue #1876 (comment) even as they have proposed that vibecoded PRs should not be allowed within #1787

Lastly i see that #1769 has been closed but it has not had any reactions

So I am genuinely wondering what is the position that the project has towards AI?

[port19x]

You summed up our stance nicely.
#1787 is my AI policy.
It isn't the projects AI policy because noone else can be assed to think about it or contribute to it at all, as you correctly state by saying it has not had any reactions.
The only appendix is that I ask for a coauthor tag in AI written PRs.

Ani-cli is and continues to be pro-human and educational.
We appreciate and encourage issues and contributions by inexperienced and low skill devs.
The matter of AI is a different axis and still an unfolding situation.