Skip to content

Conversation

@pedrooot
Copy link
Member

@pedrooot pedrooot commented Dec 4, 2025

Description

This pull request expands the SOC 2 compliance controls for Azure by adding new processing integrity requirements to the soc2_azure.json file. These additions introduce new controls and checks to ensure completeness, accuracy, timeliness, and protection of system inputs, processing, outputs, and stored data.

New Processing Integrity Controls:

  • Added five new controls under "PI1.0 - Processing Integrity" (PI1.2 to PI1.5) with detailed descriptions and associated automated checks. These cover system input measurement, data processing accuracy, output distribution and retention, and stored data protection.

Associated Automated Checks:

  • Each new control includes a set of relevant Azure checks such as logging, auditing, encryption, backup, and access controls to enforce the described requirements.

Steps to review

Please add a detailed description of how to review this PR.

Checklist

UI

  • All issue/task requirements work as expected on the UI
  • Screenshots/Video of the functionality flow (if applicable) - Mobile (X < 640px)
  • Screenshots/Video of the functionality flow (if applicable) - Table (640px > X < 1024px)
  • Screenshots/Video of the functionality flow (if applicable) - Desktop (X > 1024px)
  • Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

API

  • Verify if API specs need to be regenerated.
  • Check if version updates are required (e.g., specs, Poetry, etc.).
  • Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@pedrooot pedrooot requested review from a team as code owners December 4, 2025 13:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the compliance Issues/PRs related with the Compliance Frameworks label Dec 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

✅ All necessary CHANGELOG.md files have been updated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Conflict Markers Resolved

All conflict markers have been successfully resolved in this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.62%. Comparing base (eb24736) to head (59063d6).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (eb24736) and HEAD (59063d6). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (eb24736) HEAD (59063d6)
api 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9463      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.57%   86.62%   -5.95%     
==========================================
  Files         155      222      +67     
  Lines       22023     5632   -16391     
==========================================
- Hits        20387     4879   -15508     
+ Misses       1636      753     -883     
Flag Coverage Δ
api ?
prowler-py3.10-azure 86.62% <ø> (?)
prowler-py3.11-azure 86.62% <ø> (?)
prowler-py3.12-azure 86.62% <ø> (?)
prowler-py3.9-azure 86.62% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
prowler 86.62% <ø> (∅)
api ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

🔒 Container Security Scan

Image: prowler:ef6be68
Last scan: 2025-12-04 13:50:32 UTC

📊 Vulnerability Summary

Severity Count
🔴 Critical 3
Total 3

3 package(s) affected

⚠️ Action Required

Critical severity vulnerabilities detected. These should be addressed before merging:

  • Review the detailed scan results
  • Update affected packages to patched versions
  • Consider using a different base image if updates are unavailable

📋 Resources:

Copy link
Member

@jfagoagas jfagoagas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great addition 🎖️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compliance Issues/PRs related with the Compliance Frameworks

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants