Finetuing CodeLLaMA on LeanDojo #5
Some-random
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
|
I'm transferring this issue to Github Discussions (see https://github.com/lean-dojo/LeanDojo#questions-and-bugs) Regarding the questions themselves, they can be found in the paper by searching for "commit" or in our data generation script: https://github.com/lean-dojo/LeanDojo/blob/main/scripts/generate-benchmark-lean3.ipynb |
0 replies
|
Hi @Some-random, do you have any results on LLAMA 7B running with lean-dojo by now? It would be valuable to see how well the Reprover works on a larger language model~. And Hi @yangky11, great work here! Are you planning on running the Reprover with larger language models? |
13 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment


Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In my ATP research, I've fine-tuned a LLAMA 7B model using lean_proof_recording and used lean-gym to interact with Lean. Now, I plan to switch to LeanDoJo for improved data collection and Lean interaction. Hence, I have two queries:
1 Which exact version of miniF2F is used in the LeanDoJo paper? Was Meta's bug-reduced version employed?
2 Which repository and commit ID can enable full mathlib3 tracing, as in lean_proof_recording, to assess my fine-tuned LLAMA's performance?
All reactions