Repository navigation
[archivx] Agentic Workflow Visual Summary — 2026-08-24 #55233
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-09-23T02:26:54.077Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Overview
Over the analyzed window (2026-08-23 14:39 UTC → 2026-08-24 02:09 UTC, 203 runs with complete metadata), the agentic workflow fleet held an 88.2% success rate (179 succeeded, 24 failed). Activity was dominated by PR-facing automation — PR Sous Chef alone accounted for 33 runs with zero failures — while review/skill-check workflows generated the bulk of remaining volume. Two workflows stand out for reliability concerns: Code Scanning Fixer failed both of its 2 runs, and Design Decision Gate 🏗️ failed 3 of 12 runs (25%).
Key Metrics
Animated Diagram
The animated architecture diagram is attached as workflow artifact archivx-animated-diagram.
Top Failures
View Details
Code Scanning Fixer's 100% failure rate (on low volume — just 2 runs) is worth a closer look before it scales up; Design Decision Gate has the most absolute failures and the most run volume among the three.
Workflow Activity
View Details
Engine distribution across all 203 runs: copilot 90, pi 59, claude 26, codex 22, aider 2, crush 1, goose 1, opencode 1, gemini 1.
All reactions