-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
versioned-explicit-ref does not work for all resource types #984
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
bugThis issue describes a defect or unexpected behaviorThis issue describes a defect or unexpected behaviorcarvel acceptedThis issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completedThis issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completedpriority/important-soonMust be staffed and worked on currently or soon.Must be staffed and worked on currently or soon.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugThis issue describes a defect or unexpected behaviorThis issue describes a defect or unexpected behaviorcarvel acceptedThis issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completedThis issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completedpriority/important-soonMust be staffed and worked on currently or soon.Must be staffed and worked on currently or soon.
Type
Projects
Status
To Triage
What steps did you take:
test: xtotest: x2.What happened:
The Job was updated, but the Deployment was not.
What did you expect:
The Deployment should have been updated after the Job, because of the change-rule and the versioned-explicit-ref.
Anything else you would like to add:
From looking at the kapp docs, it seems like the Deployment's versioned-explicit-ref annotation is supposed to contain the versioned name when it's written to Kubernetes. But it doesn't - the Kubernetes dashboard shows the annotation still has the unversioned name.
Environment:
kapp --version): 0.63.1/etc/os-release): Windows 10kubectl version): 1.30.0Vote on this request
This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.
👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"
We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.