Make workpad.py own the Verification evidence record's field set

[The01Geek]

Problem Statement

As the PRFlow maintainer, I want the Verification evidence: workpad record's required field set to be defined in exactly one place that the implement run actually executes, so that CLAUDE.md and the implement skill stop disagreeing about what a completion-evidence record must carry.

The list of fields this record must carry lives only in CLAUDE.md prose. The shipped implement skill never mentions the record, and scripts/workpad.py writes it as free text that it does not check. So a run can write an incomplete record and nothing notices.

Current Behavior

• CLAUDE.md, subsection "Recording a whole-suite launch", says each record carries the command, the coordinator's outcome line, the pass/fail/skip tallies, the retained-log root, the elapsed time, and the launch's own start time. For the local tier it says the record carries the full 40-character SHA, each required check's name and conclusion, and the run URL.
• The record written on issue Grant three drift-detecting helpers to the cloud implement tier and mirror them into the matcher-probe EXTRAS list #2123's workpad by a cloud implement run (comment Grant three drift-detecting helpers to the cloud implement tier and mirror them into the matcher-probe EXTRAS list #2123 (comment)) reads Verification evidence: command=lib/test/run-parallel.sh, outcome=aggregate CLEAN, tallies=22835 passed / 0 failed / 0 skipped, retained-log root=.prflow/tmp/parallel-suite/run-381004-0/logs, elapsed=964s, flight_key=2666de0e…, HEAD 19dd752d9 — no start time, and an abbreviated SHA. Expected: a record carrying every required field. Environment: happens on every tier, because no tool checks the text.
• Verified: skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md — "Record the validated flight key on the workpad" is the only evidence-recording instruction the shipped skill carries; no file under skills/ contains the text Verification evidence:, and none under agents/ does.
• Verified: .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md — "governs this run unchanged and is not restated here" is how the repo-local extension defers the record's field list to CLAUDE.md, which no consumer checkout has.
• Verified: scripts/workpad.py — "lib/fetch-pr-context.sh captures only a bullet's first line" is the only handling --reflection text gets: the kind is checked, the text is never parsed, so a record missing a field is accepted.
• Verified: scripts/workpad.py — "Record a CI-derived completion-evidence reading" is the help text of --record-completion-evidence-ci, a structured option that validates its fields offline and writes a hidden checkpoint marker; it is the precedent for a structured record; it already carries the local-tier facts (head SHA, each check's name and conclusion, run URL) but none of the launch fields, and writes no Verification evidence: text.

Desired Behavior

scripts/workpad.py update <issue> gains one option, --record-verification-evidence, that owns the record. The caller supplies --command, --outcome, and --run-root (required; --run-root is repeatable for the two-root case, and the literal none is the accepted value for a tier-denied launch and a ceiling-terminated launch, recorded verbatim as run-root=none), plus --tallies, --elapsed, and --started-at, which are accepted when present and not required, because a denied launch and a terminated launch have none. The tool itself stamps the record time in UTC and the full 40-character head from git rev-parse HEAD, writing the literal unestablished for the head when git cannot answer. It refuses, before any PATCH, a call missing a required field, and a call whose --outcome value contains aggregate CLEAN / aggregate FAILED (the coordinator prints these as run-parallel: aggregate CLEAN and run-parallel: aggregate FAILED …) while --run-root is none. Each call appends one note-kind reflection row whose text begins Verification evidence: followed by the fields as key=value pairs; two launches leave two rows.

The shipped implement skill tells the run to call this option at its whole-suite launch site, Phase 4.3 (the only place the shipped skill launches a whole suite; this repository's mid-iteration launches, which CLAUDE.md governs, use the same option). On the local tier, --record-completion-evidence-ci itself appends the Verification evidence: row from the operands it validated (command = the gh pr checks read, outcome = the validated check name and conclusion pairs, run root = the run URL), so the CI reading has one producer. CLAUDE.md's "Recording a whole-suite launch" subsection keeps its tier policy and the four no-run-root paths but names no field: it points at the option's --help for the field set, and names the degraded arm for a local run whose installed plugin predates the option (an unrecognized arguments exit): write the same fields as a --reflection-kind note row that names the plugin version that lacked it.

User Impact

The maintainer reads one field list, in the tool that writes the record, and an incomplete record is refused instead of written. Consumer repos gain the same record on their implement workpads. Nobody else changes how they work.

Technical Context

Scope note: The files and details below are the known starting points, not the full list. Before implementing, trace the change through the codebase to find every affected call site, consumer, and layer — this issue maps the work, it does not bound it.

• Relevant Classes/Files — scripts/workpad.py (_insert_reflection_bullet, the --record-completion-evidence-ci argparse block and _encode_ci_payload as the structured precedent, _REFLECTION_KINDS); skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md Phase 4.3; CLAUDE.md subsection "Recording a whole-suite launch"; .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md (the sentence naming the note reflection kind for this marker).
• Architecture Alignment — the same shape as the existing structured evidence options on workpad.py update; the row stays a note-kind reflection because that is the one kind lib/cheap-gate.jq does not count as friction.
• Dependencies — none new; git rev-parse HEAD is already run by the CI-evidence validator. No new tool grant: scripts/workpad.py is already granted as a vendored-literal head in all three lib/capability-profiles.json profiles, and the option adds only argument-position operands.
• Data/Schema Considerations — the row is appended, never replaced (unlike the two checkpoint marker families, which replace a prior row). Existing free-text rows on old workpads stay as they are; no reader parses them.
• Cross-layer Impact — scripts/ (the option), skills/ (one invocation sentence), CLAUDE.md and the prompt extensions that name this marker (pointer wording), and the docs/internal/ pages that name CLAUDE.md as the field-list owner.

Acceptance Criteria

• scripts/workpad.py update <issue> --record-verification-evidence --command <c> --outcome <o> --run-root <r> appends one ### ℹ️ Notes reflection row whose text starts with Verification evidence: and carries command=, outcome=, run-root=, recorded-at= (UTC, stamped by the tool), and head= (the full 40-character git rev-parse HEAD, with the literal unestablished in its place when git cannot answer); --tallies, --elapsed, and --started-at appear when supplied. git grep -n 'Verification evidence' -- CLAUDE.md skills agents .prflow/prompt-extensions shows no line that enumerates two or more of the record's field names: the option's --help is the field set's single source.
• A call missing any of --command, --outcome, --run-root, and a call whose --outcome value contains the substring aggregate CLEAN / aggregate FAILED while --run-root is the literal none, exits non-zero with a named breadcrumb and performs no PATCH.
• Two calls for two launches leave two rows on the workpad; the second does not replace the first. A call with --run-root none and a non-aggregate outcome records run-root=none verbatim.
• skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md Phase 4.3, the shipped skill's whole-suite launch site, tells the run to record that launch through this option, and no file under skills/ lists the record's fields, and none under agents/ does. The file stays at or under the 61,750-byte ceiling lib/test/lint-reference-size.py enforces.
• CLAUDE.md's "Recording a whole-suite launch" subsection names no record field: its per-launch and local-tier bullets point at the option, and the .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md sentence that names the note reflection kind for this marker says the option writes it; the CLAUDE.md pointer names the degraded arm for an installed plugin that lacks the option.
• --record-completion-evidence-ci, on a pass, also appends one Verification evidence: row built from its validated operands, so a local run records its CI reading with one call.
• The rendered row begins with Verification evidence: so the review extensions' advisory (.prflow/prompt-extensions/review.md, review-and-fix.md), which looks for that text, still finds the record.
• docs/internal/claude-md-tiered-suite-rationale.md, docs/internal/implement-skill.md, and docs/internal/skills/implement-verification.md name scripts/workpad.py as the owner of the record's fields, and the rationale page's sentence about the launch start time names started-at as an accepted field.
• A .changeset/*.md file with bump: patch describes the change.

Implementation Notes

• Approach — add the option beside --record-completion-evidence-ci in scripts/workpad.py, reusing that block's validate-then-write order and the reflection writer for the row, and make the CI option call the same row writer on its pass; then replace CLAUDE.md's field list with a pointer, add one sentence to Phase 4.3, and update the extension sentence and docs pages listed below. The CLAUDE.md edit is made directly by the implementing run under the issue Guard /devflow:implement against nested-Skill tail-call early-stop: add a Skill-completion re-anchor and make the Skill rule exclusionary #366 carve-out.
• Relevant files — scripts/workpad.py; skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md; CLAUDE.md; .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md; docs/internal/claude-md-tiered-suite-rationale.md; docs/internal/implement-skill.md; docs/internal/skills/implement-verification.md; lib/test/test_python_scripts.py; a new .changeset/ file.
• Code Patterns — the --record-completion-evidence-ci argparse block and its validate-before-PATCH ordering; _insert_reflection_bullet for the row.
• Testing Strategy — behavioral tests in lib/test/test_python_scripts.py (the focused test for scripts/workpad.py), written RED first against the stubbed workpad: the refusal cases named in the Acceptance Criteria perform no PATCH; the git-unavailable case records head=unestablished and still succeeds; the two-launch case keeps both rows. The skill edit goes through the writing-skills routing the implement extension prescribes and is checked by lib/test/lint-reference-size.py.
• Documentation Needed — docs/internal/claude-md-tiered-suite-rationale.md, docs/internal/implement-skill.md, docs/internal/skills/implement-verification.md.
• Potential Gotchas — the local-tier rule that the CI reading discharges the gate is a PRFlow-repository policy and stays in CLAUDE.md; only the record's shape moves into the tool. The workpad row is read back by lib/fetch-pr-context.sh one line at a time, so the row must stay on one line (the reflection writer already joins lines). skills/implement/phases/phase-1-setup.md is 5 bytes under the ceiling — do not touch it. Record a launch right after it returns: the head is stamped at record time, so a commit between launch and record would stamp a head the suite never ran on. The /prflow:review-and-fix loop is out of scope: it records its verification in iter-<N>.json and keeps doing so.

Generated via /prflow:create-issue (v2.36.15, medium)

[The01Geek]

/prflow:implement 2131

[github-actions]

PRFlow Workpad — Issue #2131

Status: 🎉 Complete
Branch: issue-2131-make-workpad-py-own-the-verification-evidence
Run: View run
PR: #2133
Last updated: 2026-08-29 03:18 UTC

Progress

• Setup — branch & workpad

  • prompt extension resolved: implement
  • 02:08:31 — /prflow:implement run started
  • 02:09:11 — Claude job setup complete; invoking agent
  • 02:11:23 — agent entered Phase 1 setup; workpad triage passed
  • 02:11:29 — agent initialized; Phase 1 workpad hydrated
  • 02:11:39 — classification: non-bug — Adds a new --record-verification-evidence option and moves a field-list into the tool; requests new capability, describes no malfunction
  • 02:12:06 — resume-precheck: both open-PR queries ran and returned none for this issue; workpad Branch line absent; no prior attempt to adopt
  • 02:12:47 — Phase 1.1: issue-body cache written; .prflow/tmp gitignored — scratch enabled. Phase 1.3.5: early dependency preflight PROCEED.
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (projection): every Desired Behavior obligation is represented in the resolved acceptance criteria — pass complete
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (count): claimed '5 bytes under the ceiling' for phase-1-setup.md, verified '5 bytes under the ceiling' (61745 vs 61750) at HEAD
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (negative-scope): issue excluded 'review-and-fix loop verification recording (iter-.json)'; trace confirms no impact
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (negative-scope): issue claimed 'no new tool grant needed for scripts/workpad.py'; trace confirms scripts/workpad.py is already a granted vendored-literal head in lib/capability-profiles.json
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (policy): AC aligns with .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md (bump: patch is the stated default; no basis found for minor/major)
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (execution-capability): no workflow-resident acceptance criteria found — pass complete
  • 02:13:48 — issue-claim audit (verified-premise): re-checked 4 Verified: bullet(s) at HEAD — 4 hold, 0 unestablished; no premise refuted

• Implement

  • code + sweeps
  • 02:14:40 — entered Phase 2
  • 02:18:08 — Path A (implement directly): surgical change centred on scripts/workpad.py plus prose. Reuse gate: _append_reflection (note row), _devflow_repo_root, _UpdateError, _require_arity idiom, now_dt for recorded-at — no new helpers duplicate existing ones. Changeset written (bump: patch).
  • 02:18:27 — Criterion routes: AC1/AC2/AC3/AC6/AC7 → Testable (behavioral tests in test_python_scripts_part3.py, RED-first: row+fields, refusals no-PATCH, two rows, run-root=none verbatim, CI-option row, prefix). AC4 → prose skill edit (dry-trace) + lint-reference-size.py ceiling. AC5 → prose CLAUDE.md/extension (dry-trace). AC8 → internal-docs edit, doc-AC deferral to Phase 4.1. Changeset AC → genuinely-untestable prose (changeset-existence review gate). test-first: lib/test/test_python_scripts_part3.py, fails→passes (option absent → AttributeError/argparse until implemented).
  • 02:24:20 — §2.3 sweeps (diff shape: adds code guard+helpers+argparse, tests, changeset prose). 2.3.0c operand-trace: guard operands (command/outcome/run_roots) all resolve from args getattr-defaults; git head fails closed to 'unestablished'. 2.3.4 boundary: 'aggregate CLEAN'/'aggregate FAILED' verified against lib/test/run-parallel.sh:716/718. 2.3.4a: count-locked 'two launches leave two rows' comments reworded to 'each launch adds its own row'. 2.3.4b: stale-prose leg1 CLEAN; leg2 (changeset) git diff --no-index refused by classifier — manual inspection: no coverage universal. 2.3.5/2.3.6: helpers minimal (reuse _append_reflection); git failure records head=unestablished (visible breadcrumb), CI-row append best-effort with specific stderr. regenerate-artifacts: all reconciled, no drift. ruff clean.
  • 02:28:57 — Writing-skills evidence: files=skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md,.prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md mode=subagent skill-loaded=yes (superpowers:writing-skills present in the subagent's available-skills list and invoked via Skill tool before editing) guidance-applied=yes (Match-the-Form: both edits are positive-recipe additions pointing at --help rather than field lists, honoring the no-field-enumeration constraint) pressure-scenario=no (two verbatim-specified prompt-surface insertions with an exact-text constraint, not discipline-rule authoring, so no subagent pressure cycle fits) micro-tests=no (verbatim insertions dictated by the issue leave no wording to micro-test; verification was the mechanical lint-reference-size + byte-size + no-field-enumeration check). phase-4-documentation.md is 60,121 bytes (≤ 61,750 ceiling).
  • 02:29:24 — Phase 2.4: focused test lib/test/test_python_scripts_part3.py GREEN (997 passed, 0 failed). ruff clean. Prose deliverables (phase-4-documentation.md, extension) routed through writing-skills subagent (Writing-skills evidence recorded). regenerate-artifacts reconciled. All work committed and pushed.

• Review

  • prompt extension resolved: review engine
  • prompt extension resolved: fix loop
  • prompt extension resolved: code-review reception
  • Classify diff (Phase 0.5)
  • Generate verification checklist (Phase 1)
  • Verify checklist (Phase 2)
  • Review agents (Phase 3)
  • Aggregate & verdict (Phase 4)
  • Run complete — everything this run owed
  • /simplify
  • review-and-fix
  • acceptance-criteria gate
  • 02:30:02 — checkpoint 2: merged origin/main and pushed (was behind by 3; unrelated files matcher-probe.yml/config.json/cloud-allowlist.md — no symbol my change references)
  • 02:32:23 — simplify outcome: findings generated=0, applied=0, skipped-as-AC-conflict=0 (4 cleanup agents — reuse/simplification/efficiency/altitude — all returned clean)
  • 02:32:40 — mid-phase resume point recorded
  • 02:46:34 — review coverage recorded (coverage=full, dispatch=attempted, roster=complete, checklist=complete; as of head 08f51eb at 20260829T024634Z)
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member code-reviewer=dispatched
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member comment-analyzer=dispatched
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member pr-test-analyzer=dispatched
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member requesting-code-review=dispatched
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member silent-failure-hunter=dispatched
  • 02:46:34 — review roster member type-design-analyzer=gated-off
  • 02:46:50 — review engine extension states established via load-prompt-extension.sh ladders (review/review-and-fix/receiving-code-review all content-present); reached by file read inside the fix loop's turn sequence, no separate Skill return to observe
  • 02:51:27 — 3.4 gate: all 9 criteria two-verifier reconciled satisfied (all_satisfied=true, blocking=[]); dispositions recorded in this run's AC dispositions note

• Documentation

  • 02:52:43 — Phase 4.1: Documentation Needed section present in issue but extractor found no file paths (no-deliverables); the deliverable cross-check is skipped this run. The 3 named docs/internal pages were already authored in Phase 2 (AC8, gate-verified satisfied).
  • 02:53:59 — Phase 4.1: no documentation changes to commit (docs subagent ran clean; the 3 internal-docs edits were already committed in Phase 2; no external/release-notes changes needed)
  • 02:55:48 — 4.2 claim audit (behavioral): 3 claims traced against scripts/workpad.py — all match the shipped code path; no rewrite
  • 02:55:48 — 4.2 claim audit (verification): 5 Test Plan rows each bound to a named test in lib/test/test_python_scripts_part3.py; scoped to actual coverage
  • 02:55:48 — 4.2 claim audit (artifact-existence): changeset + 3 docs pages exist; Resolves Make workpad.py own the Verification evidence record's field set #2131 resolvable; no unbacked artifact claim
  • 02:55:48 — 4.2: PR body updated from placeholder; no code-level fix made; pr-description extension present (content-present)
  • 02:56:18 — checkpoint 4: observed token UP_TO_DATE — clean, proceeding to the publish decision
  • 02:59:22 — batched-regeneration: run (regenerate-artifacts.py --with-floors: all artifacts reconciled including exact-module-floors, exit 0)
  • 03:16:53 — completion verification recorded (flight 3891507fa756…, validated)

• PR marked ready

  • 03:17:52 — /prflow:implement run finished, PR published (gh pr ready): Make workpad.py own the Verification evidence record's field set #2133

Plan

• Add --record-verification-evidence + --command/--outcome/--run-root/--tallies/--elapsed/--started-at argparse args to scripts/workpad.py update, with --help enumerating the field set (single source).
• Add _git_head_or_unestablished(), _verification_evidence_row(), _validate_verification_evidence() helpers in workpad.py, reusing _append_reflection, _devflow_repo_root, _UpdateError.
• In _apply_mutations: validate-before-PATCH (missing required field; aggregate-outcome-with-run-root=none refusal), stamp recorded-at (UTC) + head (git rev-parse HEAD / unestablished), append one note-kind reflection row per launch (never replacing a prior row).
• Make --record-completion-evidence-ci on a pass also append one Verification evidence: row (command=gh pr checks, outcome=validated check name/conclusion pairs, run-root=run URL).
• Register record_verification_evidence in _has_non_checkpoint_mutation so a verification-evidence-only call PATCHes.
• RED-first behavioral tests in lib/test/test_python_scripts_part3.py: refusal cases perform no PATCH; git-unavailable stamps head=unestablished and succeeds; two-launch keeps both rows; run-root=none verbatim; CI-option appends one row.
• Edit skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md Phase 4.3 to record the whole-suite launch through this option (via writing-skills subagent), staying ≤61,750 bytes.
• Replace CLAUDE.md "Recording a whole-suite launch" field list with a pointer to the option; name the degraded plugin-predates-option arm (direct, Guard /devflow:implement against nested-Skill tail-call early-stop: add a Skill-completion re-anchor and make the Skill rule exclusionary #366 carve-out).
• Edit .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md sentence naming the note kind for this marker to say the option writes it (via writing-skills subagent).
• Update docs/internal/claude-md-tiered-suite-rationale.md, docs/internal/implement-skill.md, docs/internal/skills/implement-verification.md to name workpad.py as field owner; rationale page names started-at as accepted field.
• Add .changeset/issue-2131-*.md (bump: patch).

Acceptance Criteria

• scripts/workpad.py update <issue> --record-verification-evidence --command <c> --outcome <o> --run-root <r> appends one ### ℹ️ Notes reflection row whose text starts with Verification evidence: and carries command=, outcome=, run-root=, recorded-at= (UTC, stamped by the tool), and head= (the full 40-character git rev-parse HEAD, with the literal unestablished in its place when git cannot answer); --tallies, --elapsed, and --started-at appear when supplied. git grep -n 'Verification evidence' -- CLAUDE.md skills agents .prflow/prompt-extensions shows no line that enumerates two or more of the record's field names: the option's --help is the field set's single source.
• A call missing any of --command, --outcome, --run-root, and a call whose --outcome value contains the substring aggregate CLEAN / aggregate FAILED while --run-root is the literal none, exits non-zero with a named breadcrumb and performs no PATCH.
• Two calls for two launches leave two rows on the workpad; the second does not replace the first. A call with --run-root none and a non-aggregate outcome records run-root=none verbatim.
• skills/implement/phases/phase-4-documentation.md Phase 4.3, the shipped skill's whole-suite launch site, tells the run to record that launch through this option, and no file under skills/ lists the record's fields, and none under agents/ does. The file stays at or under the 61,750-byte ceiling lib/test/lint-reference-size.py enforces.
• CLAUDE.md's "Recording a whole-suite launch" subsection names no record field: its per-launch and local-tier bullets point at the option, and the .prflow/prompt-extensions/implement.md sentence that names the note reflection kind for this marker says the option writes it; the CLAUDE.md pointer names the degraded arm for an installed plugin that lacks the option.
• --record-completion-evidence-ci, on a pass, also appends one Verification evidence: row built from its validated operands, so a local run records its CI reading with one call.
• The rendered row begins with Verification evidence: so the review extensions' advisory (.prflow/prompt-extensions/review.md, review-and-fix.md), which looks for that text, still finds the record.
• docs/internal/claude-md-tiered-suite-rationale.md, docs/internal/implement-skill.md, and docs/internal/skills/implement-verification.md name scripts/workpad.py as the owner of the record's fields, and the rationale page's sentence about the launch start time names started-at as an accepted field.
• A .changeset/*.md file with bump: patch describes the change.

Devflow Reflection

Devflow Reflection (click to expand)

💡 Improvements

• 💡 Phase 3.4 AC-gate friction: reconcile-ac-verifiers.py forced every criterion to unestablished on the first attempt because the verifier reports keyed the per-criterion dispositions under evidence_dispositions/claim_dispositions and used bare yes/no values, while the reconciler reads the dispositions key and requires a yes|no (one-clause reason) shape with a parenthetical clause. The reconciler's stderr named the slot count undischarged but not the expected key name — surfacing the expected dispositions key (and the parenthetical-clause requirement) in that breadcrumb would have saved a round trip. The prflow:ac-evidence-verifier / prflow:ac-claim-verifier agents return dispositions correctly; the friction was in the orchestrator's transcription into the reconciler input files, which the phase-3-ac-gate.md wording could pin more explicitly.

ℹ️ Notes

• ℹ️ Phase 3.4 AC gate — two-verifier reconciled dispositions (all 9 satisfied, none blocking): - AC1 satisfied (both) — workpad.py _verification_evidence_row composes the fields; git grep shows no line enumerating 2+ field names. evidence slots type-decided/command-run/single-flight/evidence-recorded all yes/no+reason; claim slots claim-traced/command-source-read/evidence-recorded all yes/no+reason. undischarged: none. - AC2 satisfied (both) — _validate_verification_evidence raises before PATCH for missing field and aggregate+run-root=none; part3 refusal asserts pass. undischarged: none. - AC3 satisfied (both) — append loop (not replace) → two rows; run-root=none verbatim. undischarged: none. - AC4 satisfied (both) — phase-4-documentation.md §4.3 records via the option; no skills/agents field enumeration; 60121 bytes ≤ 61750; lint exit 0. undischarged: none. - AC5 satisfied (both) — CLAUDE.md subsection names no field, points at option, names degraded arm; implement.md extension says the option writes it. undischarged: none. - AC6 satisfied (both) — --record-completion-evidence-ci pass branch appends the row from validated operands; part3 CI-row assert passes. undischarged: none. - AC7 satisfied (both) — row begins with the Verification evidence: prefix constant, inserted unmodified by _append_reflection. undischarged: none. - AC8 satisfied (both) — the 3 docs pages name scripts/workpad.py as field owner; rationale page names started-at. undischarged: none. - AC9 satisfied (both) — .changeset/issue-2131-verification-evidence-owner.md carries bump: patch. undischarged: none. evidence_status_reported and claim_status_reported: satisfied for all 9. reconcile-ac-verifiers.py: all_satisfied=true, blocking=[].
• ℹ️ Verification evidence: command=lib/test/run-parallel.sh outcome=run-parallel: aggregate CLEAN run-root=.prflow/tmp/parallel-suite/run-131645-0/logs tallies=22881 passed / 0 failed / 0 skipped elapsed=980s started-at=2026-08-29T03:00:54Z recorded-at=2026-08-29T03:17:18Z head=08f51eb9f96246d9c64df2bda4f667203b5daf6d