From ec86d823d03cc1f4ac968888b96a5c15d823cf59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvan Mosberger Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Initial draft --- proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644 proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..afd299c --- /dev/null +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# Proposal: Grant program and initiative funding + +## Motivation + +- Currently there is no clear way to finance major improvements via a trusted entity +- Lack of a way to use NixOS Foundation profits in a good and transparent way, also to encourage more donations +- Provide an easy way for contributors to get paid and work together + +# Detailed Design + +There are two inter-related parts to this proposal: + +- Grant program: A way for contributors to propose ideas, work together and get paid for it via NixOS Foundation funding that can come from individual donations, and interested companies via initiative funding +- Initiative funding: A way for companies and individuals to give funds to the NixOS foundation with a guarantee that they will be used for a specific purpose, which can also be for specific grants + +The grant program can be funded from both general donations, as well as initiative funding. The initiative funding can be used for grants, but also other aligned purposes. + +![](./flow.png) + +## Part 1: Grant program + +Create a page on the website to explain this grant program. + +### Proposal evaluation waves + +A grant wave is 3 months long, comprised of two main phases, and executed by the board or someone delegated: + +- Wave start: Decide how much funds are allocated for the next period. This generally includes part of the profits and ear-marked funds. + - Publish the SC's current agenda that will be prioritised for the next period +- Proposal phase (1.5 months): Anybody can write a grant proposal by submitting a PR to a repository. + - Proposals should primarily include the team to do the work, the milestones and the amount requested. +- Wave midpoint: Close proposal submissions + - Initiate the feedback phase by reaching out to the various stakeholders + - Reach out to companies with the list of proposals for potential funding +- Feedback phase (1.5 months): Collect feedback from various stakeholders + - SC can publish a recommendation + - People with relevant authority can give feedback + - Option for companies to submit extra funding via initiative funding for specific proposals +- Wave end: Decide which proposals are accepted and merge them to signal that the work is approved to start + - Standard rejection message that hints towards alternative funding partners + +### Acceptance criteria + +- Aligns with the NixOS Foundation's purpose: Develop, propagate, and promote the adoption of a purely functional software deployment model and to support open-source projects that implement that model, as well as other activities that relate to, pertain to, and/or can be conducive to the foregoing in the broadest sense. +- We prioritise grant proposals that align with the SC's agenda +- Well-defined scope and milestones +- Confidence in the team being able to deliver + - We prioritise well-known community members to receive grants + +### Milestone evaluation + +After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work and follow up after completing each milestone with detailed reports submitted as a PRs to the evaluation repo. An appointed evaluator will evaluate the work, request changes if necessary, and give approval if satisfactory, in which case the applicants will be paid. + +![](./waves.png) + +## Part 2: Initiative funding + +- Create a page on the website that showcases team-submitted initiatives that can be funded. +- There is a contact form (see below) where companies (or individuals) can reach out to the foundation board to initiate the process of submitting funding for either a specific initiative, or a custom purpose. +- The foundation board will handle communication and provide a contract that if signed guarantees that at least 90% of the funding will be used for the stated purpose and be returned otherwise. +- The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR. +- Only companies that the SC approves of will be considered. + +![](./initiatives.png) + +### Initiative submission process + +- Official teams can submit initiatives by creating a PR against the nixos-homepage repo +- It will be reviewed by the board, with the SC being able to give a recommendation as well +- If approved it will be merged +- If there's a lot of interest by community individuals, we can also start a crowdsourcing campaign for initiatives From 1ba597f686a3997b9d6e5fb78cffa106f23cab9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvan Mosberger Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:39:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Various changes Perhaps not all listed, but: - Changed profit -> income - Linked to foundation by-laws for purpose quote - Changed "Well-known community members receive grants" -> "Confidence in the team being able to deliver by showing previous evidence of that" - Clarified that companies can be the recipient of funds for contributors, but contributors are individuals (or teams of multiple) - Also have an email address as alternative to the contact form - Also send team initiatives to interested companies, not just grants, for feedback phase - Evaluators get paid 5% of milestones, are required to submit evaluation report - Clarify that any necessary grant proposal PMs are part of the grant budget itself - Clarify that spending on grant evaluators and grant improvements does not come from ear-marked funds - SC decides which grant proposals are accepted - Make it possible to only return part of initiative funding if not all could be allocated to the dedicated purpose --- proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md | 55 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md index afd299c..8aa3620 100644 --- a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ ## Motivation - Currently there is no clear way to finance major improvements via a trusted entity -- Lack of a way to use NixOS Foundation profits in a good and transparent way, also to encourage more donations +- Lack of a way to use NixOS Foundation income in a good and transparent way, also to encourage more donations - Provide an easy way for contributors to get paid and work together # Detailed Design @@ -15,9 +15,11 @@ There are two inter-related parts to this proposal: The grant program can be funded from both general donations, as well as initiative funding. The initiative funding can be used for grants, but also other aligned purposes. -![](./flow.png) +![](./flow.svg) -## Part 1: Grant program +([source](https://excalidraw.com/#json=5_AEWLNEueZTMOMT16Q6D,rr4-C7SQdrcmVoZ2eoEQhw), make sure to update the source link when changing anything) + +## Grant program Create a page on the website to explain this grant program. @@ -25,43 +27,56 @@ Create a page on the website to explain this grant program. A grant wave is 3 months long, comprised of two main phases, and executed by the board or someone delegated: -- Wave start: Decide how much funds are allocated for the next period. This generally includes part of the profits and ear-marked funds. - - Publish the SC's current agenda that will be prioritised for the next period +- Wave start: Decide how much funds are allocated for the next period. This generally includes part of the income and ear-marked funds. + - The SC publishes its agenda that will be prioritised for the next period - Proposal phase (1.5 months): Anybody can write a grant proposal by submitting a PR to a repository. - - Proposals should primarily include the team to do the work, the milestones and the amount requested. + - Proposals should primarily include the team to do the work, the milestones, timeline, the amount requested and the recipient of the funds (can be individuals or companies) + - A team can be a single individual or multiple individuals with one of them acting as project manager - Wave midpoint: Close proposal submissions - Initiate the feedback phase by reaching out to the various stakeholders - Reach out to companies with the list of proposals for potential funding + - Also include team initiatives, same as on the website - Feedback phase (1.5 months): Collect feedback from various stakeholders - - SC can publish a recommendation - - People with relevant authority can give feedback - - Option for companies to submit extra funding via initiative funding for specific proposals -- Wave end: Decide which proposals are accepted and merge them to signal that the work is approved to start + - Teams or individuals with relevant authority are encouraged to give feedback and/or a recommendation + - Encourage companies to submit extra funding (via initiative funding) for specific proposals they care about +- Wave end: SC decides which proposals are accepted, which are then merged to signal that the work is approved to start - Standard rejection message that hints towards alternative funding partners ### Acceptance criteria -- Aligns with the NixOS Foundation's purpose: Develop, propagate, and promote the adoption of a purely functional software deployment model and to support open-source projects that implement that model, as well as other activities that relate to, pertain to, and/or can be conducive to the foregoing in the broadest sense. +- Aligns with the NixOS Foundation's purpose (copied from [original](https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/blob/master/by-laws/Oprichtingsakte_NixOsFoundation.en.pdf)): Develop, propagate, and promote the adoption of a purely functional software deployment model and to support open-source projects that implement that model, as well as other activities that relate to, pertain to, and/or can be conducive to the foregoing in the broadest sense. - We prioritise grant proposals that align with the SC's agenda - Well-defined scope and milestones -- Confidence in the team being able to deliver - - We prioritise well-known community members to receive grants +- Confidence in the team being able to deliver by showing previous evidence of that ### Milestone evaluation After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work and follow up after completing each milestone with detailed reports submitted as a PRs to the evaluation repo. An appointed evaluator will evaluate the work, request changes if necessary, and give approval if satisfactory, in which case the applicants will be paid. -![](./waves.png) +- The board/SC trusts the evaluators to do the evaluation properly +- Evaluators are required to submit an evaluation report including deliverables, evaluation notes and approval decision +- Evaluators get 5% of the milestone amount + +![](./waves.svg) + +([source](https://excalidraw.com/#json=rRutoi8nEcpjv1UIj3X87,VCPIeHZP_6ouG0U7tWQxMg), make sure to update the source link when changing anything) -## Part 2: Initiative funding +## Initiative funding -- Create a page on the website that showcases team-submitted initiatives that can be funded. -- There is a contact form (see below) where companies (or individuals) can reach out to the foundation board to initiate the process of submitting funding for either a specific initiative, or a custom purpose. -- The foundation board will handle communication and provide a contract that if signed guarantees that at least 90% of the funding will be used for the stated purpose and be returned otherwise. -- The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR. +- Create a page on the website that showcases team-submitted initiatives that can be funded + - Keep the number soft limited, don't want too many options +- There is a contact form (see below) where companies (or individuals) can reach out to the foundation board to initiate the process of submitting funding for either a specific initiative, a grant proposal, or a custom purpose. + - The contents of this page is also sent to interested companies every 3 months for the grants feedback phase +- There is a 10% management overhead that will not be allocated to the initiative funding. +- The foundation board will handle communication and provide a contract that if signed guarantees that the funding (without the 10% management overhead) will be used for the stated purpose, and that if not all of the funding could be used as such, the rest is returned. +- The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR (+10% overhead, excl. VAT) - Only companies that the SC approves of will be considered. -![](./initiatives.png) +A rough mockup might look like this, but there should also be an clickable email link as an alternative: + +![](./initiatives.svg) + +([source](https://excalidraw.com/#json=xPRvVNuVKd2W3-yUpJLcg,a3QQ56AVTOv1E-xQ9-mfbw), make sure to update the source link when changing anything) ### Initiative submission process From 85d4cadaafa83733bd0db81e5d16f2a8dace368b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvan Mosberger Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:43:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Various rewordings and minor improvements Don't have time to list everything, but mostly minor changes - Don't imply this is only for "major improvements", change to "Nix ecosystem improvements" - Clarify that funding is not limited to official projects --- proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md | 76 +++++++++---------- proposals/grants-and-initiatives/flow.svg | 4 + .../grants-and-initiatives/initiatives.svg | 4 + proposals/grants-and-initiatives/waves.svg | 4 + 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode 100644 proposals/grants-and-initiatives/flow.svg create mode 100644 proposals/grants-and-initiatives/initiatives.svg create mode 100644 proposals/grants-and-initiatives/waves.svg diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md index 8aa3620..6b8e5b3 100644 --- a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ # Proposal: Grant program and initiative funding +Alternative title: Filling funding flow gaps + ## Motivation -- Currently there is no clear way to finance major improvements via a trusted entity -- Lack of a way to use NixOS Foundation income in a good and transparent way, also to encourage more donations -- Provide an easy way for contributors to get paid and work together +- Use NixOS Foundation donations for beneficial purposes in a more transparent way +- Enable companies to finance Nix ecosystem improvements in a more streamlined way +- Enable contributors to get paid for working on Nix ecosystem improvements in a more streamlined way # Detailed Design There are two inter-related parts to this proposal: -- Grant program: A way for contributors to propose ideas, work together and get paid for it via NixOS Foundation funding that can come from individual donations, and interested companies via initiative funding -- Initiative funding: A way for companies and individuals to give funds to the NixOS foundation with a guarantee that they will be used for a specific purpose, which can also be for specific grants - -The grant program can be funded from both general donations, as well as initiative funding. The initiative funding can be used for grants, but also other aligned purposes. +- Grant program: A way for contributors to propose ideas and get paid by the NixOS Foundation for delivering milestones. The funds can come from both general-purpose donations and initiative funding. +- Initiative funding: A way for companies and individuals to provide purpose-bound funding, such as specific grants or team initiatives. ![](./flow.svg) @@ -21,33 +21,34 @@ The grant program can be funded from both general donations, as well as initiati ## Grant program -Create a page on the website to explain this grant program. +Create a page on the website to explain this. ### Proposal evaluation waves -A grant wave is 3 months long, comprised of two main phases, and executed by the board or someone delegated: +A grant wave is 3 months long, comprised of two phases, and executed by the board or someone delegated: -- Wave start: Decide how much funds are allocated for the next period. This generally includes part of the income and ear-marked funds. - - The SC publishes its agenda that will be prioritised for the next period +- Wave start: Widely announce the new wave, including: + - Decided by the board: how much funds (and how they're ear-marked, if at all) are available to be allocated. This generally includes part of the income and ear-marked funds. + - Decided by the SC: The agenda that will be prioritised for this wave - Proposal phase (1.5 months): Anybody can write a grant proposal by submitting a PR to a repository. - - Proposals should primarily include the team to do the work, the milestones, timeline, the amount requested and the recipient of the funds (can be individuals or companies) + - Proposals should primarily include the team to do the work, the milestones, timeline, the amount needed and the recipient of the funds (can be individuals or companies) + - Proposals may also be for non-official projects - A team can be a single individual or multiple individuals with one of them acting as project manager -- Wave midpoint: Close proposal submissions - - Initiate the feedback phase by reaching out to the various stakeholders - - Reach out to companies with the list of proposals for potential funding - - Also include team initiatives, same as on the website -- Feedback phase (1.5 months): Collect feedback from various stakeholders - - Teams or individuals with relevant authority are encouraged to give feedback and/or a recommendation - - Encourage companies to submit extra funding (via initiative funding) for specific proposals they care about -- Wave end: SC decides which proposals are accepted, which are then merged to signal that the work is approved to start +- Wave midpoint: Close proposal submissions, announce the feedback phase and reach out to: + - Various stakeholders for feedback, including teams or individuals + - Companies for the opportunity to submit extra funding for specific proposals (via initiative funding) + - Also mention team initiatives, same as on the website +- Feedback phase (1.5 months): Collection of feedback and funds + - Feedback from stakeholders can be discussed and acted upon + - Sign initiative funding contracts with funding companies wanting to submit funds for specific proposals +- Wave end: SC decides which proposals get funded, while proritising the agenda, which are then merged to signal that the proposal is accepted for funding and the work can start - Standard rejection message that hints towards alternative funding partners ### Acceptance criteria -- Aligns with the NixOS Foundation's purpose (copied from [original](https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/blob/master/by-laws/Oprichtingsakte_NixOsFoundation.en.pdf)): Develop, propagate, and promote the adoption of a purely functional software deployment model and to support open-source projects that implement that model, as well as other activities that relate to, pertain to, and/or can be conducive to the foregoing in the broadest sense. -- We prioritise grant proposals that align with the SC's agenda -- Well-defined scope and milestones -- Confidence in the team being able to deliver by showing previous evidence of that +Beyond standard legal requirements, the grant proposals must: +- Have well-defined scope and milestones +- Have a team that the SC is confident in being able to deliver by showing previous evidence of that ### Milestone evaluation @@ -63,24 +64,19 @@ After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work ## Initiative funding -- Create a page on the website that showcases team-submitted initiatives that can be funded - - Keep the number soft limited, don't want too many options -- There is a contact form (see below) where companies (or individuals) can reach out to the foundation board to initiate the process of submitting funding for either a specific initiative, a grant proposal, or a custom purpose. +- Establish a process for going into contracts with companies to supply funding for specific purposes, with a guarantee that the funding (without an additional 10% management overhead) will be used for the stated purpose, and that if not all of the funding could be used as such, the rest is repurposed according to the funder companies wishes. + - There is a 10% management overhead that will not be allocated to the initiative funding. + - The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR (+10% overhead, excl. VAT). + - Only companies that the SC approves of will be considered. +- Create a page on the website that showcases a list of efforts that are looking for funding + - This includes team-submitted initiatives and grant proposals from the current feedback phase + - Official teams can submit initiatives by creating a PR against the nixos-homepage repo, which is reviewed by the board/SC before merged + - There is a contact form for companies to reach out to initiate the process of submitting funding for either a listed effort, or a custom one + - A rough mockup might look like this, but there should also be a clickable email link as an alternative: - The contents of this page is also sent to interested companies every 3 months for the grants feedback phase -- There is a 10% management overhead that will not be allocated to the initiative funding. -- The foundation board will handle communication and provide a contract that if signed guarantees that the funding (without the 10% management overhead) will be used for the stated purpose, and that if not all of the funding could be used as such, the rest is returned. -- The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR (+10% overhead, excl. VAT) -- Only companies that the SC approves of will be considered. - -A rough mockup might look like this, but there should also be an clickable email link as an alternative: +- If there's a lot of interest by community individuals, we can also start a crowd-funding campaign for initiatives + - Crowd-funding campaigns are seen as a donation without a legal guarantee of the funding being used for the purpose or returned ![](./initiatives.svg) ([source](https://excalidraw.com/#json=xPRvVNuVKd2W3-yUpJLcg,a3QQ56AVTOv1E-xQ9-mfbw), make sure to update the source link when changing anything) - -### Initiative submission process - -- Official teams can submit initiatives by creating a PR against the nixos-homepage repo -- It will be reviewed by the board, with the SC being able to give a recommendation as well -- If approved it will be merged -- If there's a lot of interest by community individuals, we can also start a crowdsourcing campaign for initiatives diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/flow.svg b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/flow.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a863d96 --- /dev/null +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/flow.svg @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ + + +InitiativefundingOpenCollectiveProjectsEar-markedfundsGenericfunds+10%Initiative spending(e.g. grant program,teams, ...)GeneralDonationsOther expenses(admin, grantevaluators andimprovements) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/initiatives.svg b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/initiatives.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d8496c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/initiatives.svg @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ + + +John DoeName*:john@example.comEmail*:Example LTDCompany:To improve security of the official Nixprojects, with efforts such as SecureBoot,SBOMs, and supporting the security teamPurpose:NixpkgsInfraSecurity10'000Amount:Template:*click*EUR<>Send Inquiry10% overhead: 1'000 EURgrant#1Grants:grant#1grant#1SecureBoot for NixOSC API stabilisationStdenv refactorTotal*: 11'000 EUR*: Taxes may apply \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/waves.svg b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/waves.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a422718 --- /dev/null +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/waves.svg @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ + + +TimeWave 1Proposal phase(submit project,team, milestones)Feedback phase(from relevantpeople, collectextra funding) Continuous milestone evaluationWave 2Wave 3............ \ No newline at end of file From 5ba114c30ddcab4b36c7ed5cdb7409fbd69c8628 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvan Mosberger Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:28:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Include @cafkafk's proposed SC criteria and process Minorly revised with @infinisil --- proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md | 29 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md index 6b8e5b3..e4d0398 100644 --- a/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md +++ b/proposals/grants-and-initiatives/README.md @@ -41,15 +41,10 @@ A grant wave is 3 months long, comprised of two phases, and executed by the boar - Feedback phase (1.5 months): Collection of feedback and funds - Feedback from stakeholders can be discussed and acted upon - Sign initiative funding contracts with funding companies wanting to submit funds for specific proposals -- Wave end: SC decides which proposals get funded, while proritising the agenda, which are then merged to signal that the proposal is accepted for funding and the work can start +- Wave end: SC decides which proposals get funded, while proritising the agenda and satisfying the [SC's evaluation criteria and process](#sc-evaluation-criteria-and-process), which are then merged to signal that the proposal is accepted for funding and the work can start + - The board ensures standard legal requirements - Standard rejection message that hints towards alternative funding partners -### Acceptance criteria - -Beyond standard legal requirements, the grant proposals must: -- Have well-defined scope and milestones -- Have a team that the SC is confident in being able to deliver by showing previous evidence of that - ### Milestone evaluation After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work and follow up after completing each milestone with detailed reports submitted as a PRs to the evaluation repo. An appointed evaluator will evaluate the work, request changes if necessary, and give approval if satisfactory, in which case the applicants will be paid. @@ -67,7 +62,8 @@ After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work - Establish a process for going into contracts with companies to supply funding for specific purposes, with a guarantee that the funding (without an additional 10% management overhead) will be used for the stated purpose, and that if not all of the funding could be used as such, the rest is repurposed according to the funder companies wishes. - There is a 10% management overhead that will not be allocated to the initiative funding. - The minimum required funding is 1000 EUR (+10% overhead, excl. VAT). - - Only companies that the SC approves of will be considered. + - The [SC's evaluation criteria and process](#sc-evaluation-criteria-and-process) have to be met + - The board ensures standard legal requirements - Create a page on the website that showcases a list of efforts that are looking for funding - This includes team-submitted initiatives and grant proposals from the current feedback phase - Official teams can submit initiatives by creating a PR against the nixos-homepage repo, which is reviewed by the board/SC before merged @@ -80,3 +76,20 @@ After grant proposals are kicked off, the applicants are expected to do the work ![](./initiatives.svg) ([source](https://excalidraw.com/#json=xPRvVNuVKd2W3-yUpJLcg,a3QQ56AVTOv1E-xQ9-mfbw), make sure to update the source link when changing anything) + +## SC evaluation criteria and process + +To make the SC's funding decisions consistent, reviewable, and defensible, this sets out the criteria the SC evaluates against and how it records each one. + +In addition to the existing requirements, the SC weighs whether a funder or proposal could harm the project, and whether the work being funded is genuinely useful. + +Criteria under consideration include +- Reputational, financial, or moral harm to the project. +- Applicability and usefulness, whether consensus from relevant stakeholders exists or is needed, and whether the SC would be needed to shepherd the effort. +- Reduce risk of failure, such as by ensuring sufficient milestone granularity, feasability, and considering history of completion or non-completion by the parties involved. +- Opportunity cost of allocating funding here versus elsewhere, and a baseline bar for the work being worth the funding. +- Conflicts of interest among the funder, the proposal, the relevant governing parties, or the affected areas of work. + +The SC can also set criteria in advance that rule out cases such as specific categories, projects, funders, recipients, where the likely harm outweighs the benefit. These standing criteria are reviewed from time to time and can be added or lifted the same way. The SC will also revisit a standing criterion when the facts that motivated it have shifted substantially. + +SC members record and own their reasoning for every decision, alongside the SC's unified reasoning, and may approve or decline on any of these grounds. The SC refines the criteria as it learns, including when a funded effort ends up harming the ecosystem, so the decisions that follow are sharper. From ce1df371915506056a8dbc20b6545c9de23dd6fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvan Mosberger Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:53:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Add SC/board as codeowner to proposals --- .github/CODEOWNERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/.github/CODEOWNERS b/.github/CODEOWNERS index 02af3e0..dca1c09 100644 --- a/.github/CODEOWNERS +++ b/.github/CODEOWNERS @@ -33,3 +33,5 @@ /doc/calendar.md @tomberek @cafkafk @infinisil /doc/nixcon.md @NixOS/steering /doc/hetzner.md @NixOS/infra + +/proposals @NixOS/foundation @NixOS/steering