fix(web): align site brand strings and tidy redesign leftovers

[Hmbown]

Summary

Follow-ups to the #4362 documentation-led redesign, addressing the four non-blocking findings from its review pass:

• Align user-visible brand strings across all web pages to the "Codewhale" wordmark the redesign introduced — repo URLs and the Hmbown/CodeWhale slug are untouched.
• Deduplicate the homepage topic special-cases: topicHref() and TopicList now share one TOPIC_PAGE_OVERRIDES map instead of two hardcoded id lists that could drift.
• Replace the stale pre-rebrand ink rgba(14,14,16,…) with the palette ink rgb(27,34,48) in globals.css and the mobile menu divider.
• Remove the dead .site-install-link CSS now that the desktop nav no longer renders an Install button.

Testing

Web-only change, so the Rust gates don't apply:

• eslint . — clean

• vitest run — 42 tests passed

• node scripts/check-docs.mjs — PASS

• Next.js production build — compiled, all 39 pages generated

• cargo fmt --all -- --check (n/a — no Rust changes)

• cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features (n/a)

• cargo test --workspace --all-features (n/a)

Checklist

• Updated docs or comments as needed
• Added or updated tests where relevant (existing web tests cover the touched pages)
• Verified TUI behavior manually if UI changes (n/a — public site only)
• Harvested/co-authored credit uses a GitHub numeric noreply address (n/a — no harvested work)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01LDgEjx15zGLkE5gCuWFVWu

---

Generated by Claude Code

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[claude]

Claude finished @Hmbown's task in 3m 34s —— View job

---

Review: fix(web): align site brand strings and tidy redesign leftovers

• Gather context (diff, changed files, custom review priorities)
• Review brand-string alignment changes
• Review TOPIC_PAGE_OVERRIDES dedup in homepage
• Review CSS/ink color changes
• Review check-docs.mjs changes
• Post final review

This is a clean, low-risk follow-up PR. I reviewed the full diff (c220abd...HEAD, matches the stated 165/-136 across 25 files). Findings below, in priority order per repo review guidelines.

Correctness: No bugs found. Nothing here touches provider/model routing (repo review priority #2 doesn't apply — this is UI text/CSS/lint tooling only).

web/scripts/check-docs.mjs (new source-checkout casing gate):

• checkInstallSnippets() now also parses the FROM_SOURCE snippet's git clone .../<repo> + cd <dir> pair and fails the gate if they don't match casing. Logic checked by hand: the regex /git clone https:\/\/github\.com\/Hmbown\/([^\s\]+)\s*\ncd\s+([^\s\`]+)/correctly matches the actual snippet ininstall/page.tsx:56-57 (git clone https://github.com/Hmbown/CodeWhale` / cd CodeWhale), and .git suffix stripping is handled. Good defensive addition given the wordmark rename — this is what keeps the one remaining literal CodeWhale string (the repo-slug-derived clone dir) honest.
• Minor: this script isn't covered by vitest (consistent with how the rest of check-docs.mjs was already untested pre-PR, so not a new gap introduced by this change — just noting for awareness).

Homepage dedup (web/app/[locale]/page.tsx): TOPIC_PAGE_OVERRIDES cleanly replaces the two hardcoded id !== "install" && id !== "providers" checks with one map used by both topicHref() and topicIsExternal(). Correct and exactly the dedup described in the PR body — no drift risk left between the two call sites.

Brand string sweep: Spot-checked every touched page (faq, contribute, runtime, community, constitution, digest, docs/*, models, roadmap, feed, install) plus the prompt strings in lib/community-agent.ts, lib/deepseek.ts, lib/content-watch.ts. All are straightforward "CodeWhale" → "Codewhale" wordmark swaps; command names (codewhale), the codewhale.net domain, and Hmbown/CodeWhale repo-slug references are correctly left untouched, matching the PR's stated scope. Confirmed via grep that no stray CodeWhale wordmark instances remain outside the one guarded by the new check-docs gate.

One thing worth a quick sanity check (not a blocker): in contribute/page.tsx, the fork bootstrap snippet was changed from git clone git@github.com:YOU/CodeWhale / cd CodeWhale to .../YOU/Codewhale / cd Codewhale. A real GitHub fork actually inherits the upstream repo's exact case (CodeWhale), not the wordmark's lowercase w — so a contributor pasting this verbatim would still successfully clone (GitHub repo lookups are case-insensitive) and end up with a local directory named Codewhale, which is harmless but doesn't literally match their fork's on-disk GitHub name. Since this placeholder isn't the canonical Hmbown/CodeWhale slug the PR says is untouched, this looks like an intentional call to keep the snippet visually aligned with the new wordmark rather than an oversight — just flagging so it's a conscious choice rather than a missed case.

CSS (globals.css, mobile-menu.tsx): rgba(14,14,16,…) → rgb(27,34,48,…) swap and .site-install-link removal are both verified as dead-code/stale-color cleanup with no remaining references (.site-install-link was only referenced in the deleted rules).

Testing: I wasn't able to re-run eslint/vitest/the Next.js build in this sandboxed review environment (network/npm execution isn't permitted here), so I relied on static review of the diff rather than re-verifying the PR's reported "42 tests passed" / clean build claims.

Nice, tightly-scoped follow-up — no changes requested.