More dictionary/tuple list helpers

[foresthu2006]

Out of curiosity, I was wondering why there aren't filter/value equivalents of functions that operate on a list of tuples, eg filter_by_key, group_by_value, or map_values. As one use case, It'd be great to have more support for operations after calling group_by.

I really enjoy using Pyfunctional, and I'm happy to contribute if there are no blockers here!

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[EntilZha]

Sorry for out-close, I've been busy.

I'm a little wary of starting to add tons of functions, although not necessarily opposed. The main thing I'd be looking for in a proposal for what to add is how it doesn't become just adding the whole API with _by_key and _by_value and ideally having a more general solution.

There seem to be (at least) two categories here. (1) convenience functions to make things shorter, for at least some of these I think the ability to register user defined functions can cover this, since not everyone will need every method to have _by_key or _by_value. (2) new functionality that isn't easily replicated by calling filter(lambda x: fn(x[]) instead of filter_by_key(fn). The things that came to mind are what might be after groupby.

Sorry for the long response period!

[vadyalex]

I got a feeling I would like to have _map_by_key once or twice recently..
Re-iterating my thoughts I identified the root cause for myself is why would I want to have such "short cut" possibly because of PEP 3113.

Currently (building index of only "unique" elements I did recently):

        (
            seq(
                objects
            )
            .map(
                lambda obj: (
                    (obj['type'], obj['id']),
                    obj
                ),
            )
            .group_by_key()
            .filter(
                lambda _: len(_[1]) == 1  # <--- access tuple's right side via index
            )
            .to_dict()
        )

Could have being:

        (
            seq(
                objects
            )
            .map(
                lambda obj: (
                    (obj['type'], obj['id']),
                    obj
                ),
            )
            .group_by_key()
            .filter_by_value(                              # <--- "convenience" function extending API
                lambda _: len(_) == 1   # <--- now one can access tuple's right side directly in lambda
            )
            .to_dict()
        )

With tuple parameter unpacking still in place:

        (
            seq(
                objects
            )
            .map(
                lambda obj: (
                    (obj['type'], obj['id']),
                    obj
                ),
            )
            .group_by_key()
            .filter(                              # <--- same API
                lambda _, group: len(group) == 1   # <--- unpacking tuple to access tuple's right side
            )
            .to_dict()
        )

Possible improvement I can think of would be to introduce helper function to deal with tuple unpacking workaround discussed here, such as:

         import functools

        def star(f):
            @functools.wraps(f)
            def f_inner(args):
                return f(*args)
            return f_inner

        (
            seq(
                objects
            )
            .map(
                lambda obj: (
                    (obj['type'], obj['id']),
                    obj
                ),
            )
            .group_by_key()
            .filter(                              # <--- same API
                star(
                    lambda _, group: len(group) == 1 # <--- unpacked tuple via `star` function to access tuple's right side
                )
            )
            .to_dict()
        )

What do you think? Is it worth adding star helper function to pyfunctional.utils instead/along side of extending API?

[EntilZha]

Ya, I see what you're saying and looking at the API again, I thin it would be reasonable to have _by_value and by_key methods for a limited set functions. Would having it on map, filter, and group_by fill most use cases you think? I think that would be reasonable to add and would accept a PR implementing that. Thanks!

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.